Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Harald Meland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>> The fact that it's named .arch-log-library and not .tla-log-library > >>> is also intentional: Another arch client could use it. > >> > >> Until there actually is some agreement to use this kind of structure > >> from other frontends besides xtla, I think it would make more sense if > >> the directory name better reflected the fact that the structure > >> currently is xtla-specific. > > > > I disagree here: This would mean renaming the directory if someone > > else starts using it. I don't like the idea of moving configuration > > directories from one version to the other. > > What about creating a second directory called "~/.arch-frontends/" (or > perhaps something good) for non-Xtla specific stuff? So, "~/.xtla/" > would contain our stuff, and "~/.arch-frontends/" would contain stuff > that is potentially useful for other front-ends. > > I'm not overly concerned either way; just thought I'd toss out the idea.
I like the idea of a ~/.xtla/ directory. It would reduce the amount of files in the home directory. Additionally it keeps the files for xtla together. Stefan.
