Quoting Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How do you think using ?r as prefix and giving sub key like: > > rf => remove file and id > ri => remove id only
Good. Anyway, those commands are potentially harmfull (not too much because you are prompted before deleting, but ...), so, it's not really a problem to have a longer key sequence. > Function name should be > > ***-remove-files > ^^^^^ > ***-delete-id Yep! As we are talking about key bindings for inventory: We should have a command to select a directory recursively (PCL-CVS has this). How about using the prefix `D' for commands applied recursively? D m => mark recursively D a => Add directory and its subdirectories D r i => remove directory recursively D r f => delete directory recursively -- Matthieu ------------------------------------------------- envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !
