Matthieu MOY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > How do you think using ?r as prefix and giving sub key like: > > > > rf => remove file and id > > ri => remove id only > > Good. Anyway, those commands are potentially harmfull (not too much because > you > are prompted before deleting, but ...), so, it's not really a problem to have > a > longer key sequence. > > > Function name should be > > > > ***-remove-files > > ^^^^^ > > ***-delete-id > > Yep! > > As we are talking about key bindings for inventory: We should have a command > to > select a directory recursively (PCL-CVS has this). How about using the prefix > `D' for commands applied recursively? > > D m => mark recursively > D a => Add directory and its subdirectories > D r i => remove directory recursively > D r f => delete directory recursively >
That is all o.k. for me. Stefan.
