Quoting Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Think about it: If you use arch-tags in the files, then "tla > rm BLA" and "rm BLA" are equivalent. If the file has no > tag-line and has not been added explicitly then "tla rm BLA" > will complain about a missing ID. The funny thing is "tla > mv" will always work, if there is ID not does not matter. > > Too bad that "tla rm" does not, since this would allow us to > simply get rid of the defun and binding for tla-inventory-delete-files ... > Maybe "tla rm" should be fixed, thus that users my simply > use it as "tla mv" without caring for IDs ...
I fixed several things about that a few days ago. No time to check now, but I think tla-delete-file will call the right command (rm or tla rm) depending on the tagging method. > I fixed this some time ago, fixing it again is tedious if > someone else is reverting it again. Wasn't it simply a problem of conflict/bad merge than someone reverting your change ? -- Matthieu ------------------------------------------------- envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !
