> > I introduced ?M as merge commands prefix in inventory mode. > > > > M r tla-inventory-replay > > M s tla-inventory-star-merge > > > > Instead, mirror uses ?<. > > This fits nicely to ?> for get ...
Which are you talking about "merge" or "mirror"? About mirror, I feel the data stream direction of "mirror" is different with "get". About "merge", I agree. the data stream direction of "merge" is the same with "get". However, "merge" functions are the most important in tla, so I think merge functions should have their own prefix. I'm still new to arch/tla, so my opinion cannot be strong.
