> Moinak, why are you adding xkbdata? Can't you just use > SUNWxorg-xkb from the g11n consolidation?
[...] > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- > - alan.coopersmith at sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System > em Engineering Alan, I have to agree with Moinak in that the situation concerning xkb is everything but totally clear. You yourself had (an empty) pkgdefs subdir for SUNWxorg-xkb in XW_NV/packages previously: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/xwin-discuss/2007-February/000983.html Empty for an unknown reason. Now it is gone all together: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/packages/ I also fail to find out, where I might get the src and/or pkgdefs for it, I cannot find it in the (public) g11 consolidation, neither in src, nor as re-distributable binary package: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/g11n/downloads/software/current/g11n-src-structure.txt http://src.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=xkb http://www.google.com/search?q=%22SUNWxorg-xkb%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Well, it may be true that SUNWxorg-xkb ships as part of SX[C-D]R, also on SPARC for a while now: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=deb51f85411099436dfe24bc0a5?bug_id=6520105 But what are we doing here, working on a *FullyOPEN*-X? If that is the case, having to depend on un-redistributable binary pkgs isn't of too much use. I also think we can finally set the packaging version information to the true value which is 7.2.0 now, rather than continuing the downward_to_Solaris10 compatibility nonsense of still taking 6.8.x or 6.9.x as value: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/packages/pkgversion http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=105245𙬝 On March 28 5:55PM Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Is there a good reason connected to the version mismatch? > Because I didn't get around to updating them. I really need to change the > package version to something completely different, since it's a bug that it > looks anything like the Xorg version number. (It's due to this bug that > the Solaris 10 patches claim to be for "X11 6.8.0" even when they're > delivering > Xorg 6.9 or 7.2, since package versions can't change in Solaris Update > Releases > or patches, so the Solaris 10 packages are stuck at 6.8.0 versions forever.) Hey, we are working on something that is going to be part of what might one day replace Solaris10, if not even 11. We should upgrade the version to its true value. You can still change it back for your Solaris10 deliveries. http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/packages/SUNWxorg-server/pkginfo.tmpl p.s. I'm going to leave xkb where I, personally, currently have it, inside SUNWxorg-data (partially derived from Moinak's work). You can later still adjust the Makefiles and pkgdefs to your wishes, removing something is done quickly. For now it has to work and has to be re-distributable by 3rd parties (BeleniX, MartUX, Indiana, SchilliX, Nextenda, YouNameIt_*niX). And it currently meets both of these requirements. I'm wondering, why you are referencing next to 40 packages in http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/make_release_packages, while only 23 pkgdefs are contained in your FOX src: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/packages/ Or are the missing pkgdefs (and src?) those, you had mentioned some time ago and want to publish soon? For the mesa-symlinks I have mostly returned to what you had pre-defined for x86. What do you think? Regards, %martin This message posted from opensolaris.org
