Hi Luc, >Would it be beneficial for CohesiveFrictionalPM to follow the same rule (use of ScGeom6D instead of ScGeom)?
The classes in mail title are not using S6D, they are still using the good old ScGeom. I've been looking at your code, it uses ScGeom functionalities correctly. S6D would probably let you remove a few lines, but not so much. initialOrientation1/2 could be removed from NormShearPhys (because it would be in ScGeom6D). I'm not sure it is worth the effort, and it would result in something very similar to Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment. Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment is in fact able to reproduce CohesiveFrictionalPM, but it can do more. Namely, thanks to Chiara, it is now possible to unload moment elasticaly if you want (in CFPM plasticity is always reversible). Cheers. Bruno > Thanks for your advice > > Luc > > 2011/1/25 Jerome Duriez <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > (sorry for...) > > r2676 gets rid of the use of FrictPhysTrans... for > NormalInelasticityPhys > > Jerome > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- _______________ Bruno Chareyre Associate Professor ENSE³ - Grenoble INP Lab. 3SR BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21 Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43 ________________
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
