Hi Alessandro,
At 09:13 10-08-2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Perhaps, we could as well do it quickly enough to not delay the WG shutdown
considerably. I concur with SM that we should avoid prolonged discussions,
and a time constraint gives that. Do we need to recharter to put the
revision as a WG draft?
Pete, who happens to be the Responsible Area Director, for this
working group commented on the discussion about shutting down. The
working group has been given ample opportunity to overcome the inevitable.
A recharter is off the table (see minutes from IETF81).
For clarity, let me add that I don't oppose to separate drafts for proposals
that deserve one. The additional section I propose is meant to actually
grant a chance to any half-baked issue that wouldn't be put forward
otherwise, so as to take a correct position fix for SMTP.
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00731.html
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
