Hi Alessandro,
At 05:23 11-08-2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
You mean http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00727.html?
The decision was taken to the mailing list (see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00697.html
). The mailing list (in)activity during the current year speaks for itself.
Importing XML for 5321bis has been tried already. Does Pete mean the XML of
the pre-evaluation doc? There are some tracker issues to be added, change
I leave it to Pete to comment if he thinks that it is necessary.
There seems to be about a dozen of us who are still loitering around this
dying WG. Is it enough to get a rough consensus?
Please see the last paragraph of the message from Pete at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00727.html I'll
be candid; a dozen "Yes" might not be read as rough consensus. There
would have to be a large number of YAM WG participants who explain
why the work should be done.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
