[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15648944#comment-15648944
]
Subru Krishnan commented on YARN-5761:
--------------------------------------
First up, +1 on the proposal but shouldn't we first close the action items from
our discussion summarized
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5734?focusedCommentId=15612431]
in YARN-5734 before we start adding patches? [~leftnoteasy]/[~xgong], thoughts?
> Separate QueueManager from Scheduler
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5761
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5761
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: capacityscheduler
> Reporter: Xuan Gong
> Assignee: Xuan Gong
> Labels: oct16-medium
> Attachments: YARN-5761.1.patch, YARN-5761.1.rebase.patch,
> YARN-5761.2.patch
>
>
> Currently, in scheduler code, we are doing queue manager and scheduling work.
> We'd better separate the queue manager out of scheduler logic. In that case,
> it would be much easier and safer to extend.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
