[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14369690#comment-14369690 ]
Junping Du commented on YARN-3225: ---------------------------------- bq. I would prefer to have the name in sync with the client side terminology as we are specifying the client side value as timeout. +1. bq. If we change the event to DECOMMISSION_WITH_DELAY, do you agree to change the client side name from timeout to delay? Hmmm. How about we change both with DECOMMISSION_DELAY_WITH_TIMEOUT? :) > New parameter or CLI for decommissioning node gracefully in RMAdmin CLI > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-3225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3225 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Junping Du > Assignee: Devaraj K > Attachments: YARN-3225.patch, YARN-914.patch > > > New CLI (or existing CLI with parameters) should put each node on > decommission list to decommissioning status and track timeout to terminate > the nodes that haven't get finished. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)