[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14369690#comment-14369690
 ] 

Junping Du commented on YARN-3225:
----------------------------------

bq.  I would prefer to have the name in sync with the client side terminology 
as we are specifying the client side value as timeout.
+1. 

bq. If we change the event to DECOMMISSION_WITH_DELAY, do you agree to change 
the client side name from timeout to delay?
Hmmm. How about we change both with DECOMMISSION_DELAY_WITH_TIMEOUT? :)

> New parameter or CLI for decommissioning node gracefully in RMAdmin CLI
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3225
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Devaraj K
>         Attachments: YARN-3225.patch, YARN-914.patch
>
>
> New CLI (or existing CLI with parameters) should put each node on 
> decommission list to decommissioning status and track timeout to terminate 
> the nodes that haven't get finished.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to