[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15319590#comment-15319590
]
Arun Suresh commented on YARN-5124:
-----------------------------------
[~curino], I did infact try moving the remoteRequestTable to another class..
unfortunately, I don't think it would buy anything much.. considering that
there are sections of the {{AMRMClientImpl}} that makes decisions based on some
of the intermediate sub-maps.. thereby making it bit of a leaky abstraction.
In anycase, I do think your suggestion is good, but would probably exceed the
scope of this JIRA since that would be quite a clean up effort to refactor the
AMRMClientImpl to properly rip out the map into a separate entity.
> Modify AMRMClient to set the ExecutionType in the ResourceRequest
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5124
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5124
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Arun Suresh
> Assignee: Arun Suresh
> Attachments: YARN-5124.001.patch, YARN-5124.002.patch,
> YARN-5124.003.patch, YARN-5124.004.patch, YARN-5124.005.patch,
> YARN-5124.006.patch, YARN-5124.008.patch, YARN-5124.009.patch,
> YARN-5124.010.patch, YARN-5124.011.patch,
> YARN-5124_YARN-5180_combined.007.patch, YARN-5124_YARN-5180_combined.008.patch
>
>
> Currently the {{ContainerRequest}} allows the AM to set the {{ExecutionType}}
> in the AMRMClient, but it is not being set in the actual {{ResourceRequest}}
> that is sent to the RM
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
