Li Lu commented on YARN-5699:

Thanks [~sjlee0]. This said I'm generally fine with Rohith's planning. End time 
looks belong to an entity but not just an event, too. For start time, it looks 
natural to have some queries like "list all the apps start in a time window and 
finished in a time window"? So if it's not too expensive, I think it's fine to 
also put it in info field? 

> Retrospect yarn entity fields which are publishing in events info fields.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-5699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5699
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Rohith Sharma K S
>            Assignee: Rohith Sharma K S
>         Attachments: 0001-YARN-5699.YARN-5355.patch, 0001-YARN-5699.patch, 
> 0002-YARN-5699.YARN-5355.patch
> Currently, all the container information are published at 2 places. Some of 
> them are at entity info(top-level) and some are  at event info. 
> For containers, some of the event info should be published at container info 
> level. For example : container exist status, container state, createdTime, 
> finished time. These are general information to container required for 
> container-report. So it is better to publish at top level info field. 

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to