Morning Cadres Thanks for your speedy response gester. I think we are well in agreement. Matimba's proposal is sound, but u see comrades we can’t limit this to just former SASCO leadership, we all know politics around succession. And I wuld not want us cader Funky and Sjijo to take the more institutionally structured route of alumina/convocation or saus for that matter, as much as these organisations have a role to play, they have not done anything which can be seen as preventative to the plight of students at TUT as per their PoA, or students in HE at large, I can speak to this with some authority as i was there at all these launches when all those strategic goals were set, besides there is to many politics around them.
Phasha & Mdu your assesments of the situation is spot on. What really does worry me is tendencies of individuals in organised workers formations acting to what seems to me and the rest of us as ‘opportunistic’ and Mdu’s assessments of the 2007 strike(s) says a lot about that. I would therefore recommend the following steps. 1. We get clear reports on the PYA and other structures (SAUS, Alumina, convocation, ect.) interventions. 2. We get clear reports from the TUT as well as Nehawu on what the impasse is REALLY. 3. We set up a task team to do the above. The task team must use different e & communication forums to call a ‘meeting’ of all progressive forces by next week. it can be on Friday 20th February in the late afternoon, to accommodate those who are out of civilisation (lol Gauteng) 4. for task team would suggest the following, that Phasha coordinate those caders in Limpopo, Funky & Mdu coordinate Mpumalanga, Tsholo, Reggie & Matimba, Masuku coordinate Gauteng. Tom, Given and others coordinate point 1 & 2 above. 5. We can get other cadres to assist the task team, this is not casting stone as this is just a task team to gather progressive minds. 6. Lastly; comrades we need to be bold and pragmatic, as far as I can recall there has been at least 2 student strikes and 1 union strike year on year since Tyobeka and his EMC took office. a. The only conclusion after 5 years is that we call boldly for his head and the immediate restructuring of that EMC & Council. b. DoE must be more hands on with regard to revisiting the aims of merger and getting them on track. If there are other different views to this one, of which we must agree on, in our Friday 20th February meeting, pls lets engage!! • Oh we must also call the union (or individuals in the union) into order as they are really not assisting. A Luta….. > I share the sentiment which begin to say, all progressive froces alike > should take a keen interest at recent devlopments at TUT and ultimatly > provide a solution to this problem. Whereas the objectives of the Merger > are noble and progressive, its implementation remains problematic and > retrogressive.A variety of factors can be attributed to this unfortunate > state of affairs, but central to them is the role of Goverment in higher > education and merger program in particular. > > We all agree that the dual education system as created by aperthied was > raectionary and unsastainable.The system had to be changed into a more > inclusive,intergrated,qualitative and responssive one. The merger was born > out of this reality,to neccessarily address matters pertaining > redress,access with success,transformation, funding etc. We need to be > honest in terms of the vision, focus, capacity and leadership of > Department of Education in so far as merger was concrned. My own personal > analsis is that the Department lacked a comprohensive and unitary strategy > to implement,coordinate and oversee the Merger process. The Department > simply entrusted leadership f Higher Education Institutions with the > responsbility to manage the merger process. Let us take for instance the > process of Insitutional Operational Plan and Topography, i believe it > would have been a good move for the Department to be at the centre of such > critical processes. On the contrary the Department allowed Institutions to > draw their own plans, only for the Department to comment later when the > process is underway. TUT for an example exploited this gap by coming with > a probelmatic Topography of Faculity based Campuses, you also look at the > orgonogram of 4 DVC. > > We must also point out to the fact that Trade Unions at TUT have not been > helpfull in terms of how they see the process. In fact there is a problem > of opportunism there, some trade union leaders agree with certain > reactionary decisions only when it personally benefits them. They then > oppose even rational proposals when it suits them. Equelly we must take a > balme as a student movement, the truth of the matter is that we have never > devaloped a concrete and detailed position on the implementation of the > merger process and such individuals were quided by their feelings and > prefrences. > > What you need at TUT therefore is a sort of polotical leadeship process of > bringing people together, it is clear that all forces are pulling in > different directions.The Visioon,Mission,Strategi direction and objectives > of the Institution has not been adequatly shared and debated by all key > stakeholders. The Institution itsels is faced with number of challenges > including a high salary bill of more than 70% of its total > budget(recommended salary bill is 62%), huge infrastructural disparaties > and backlog, law pass rate and graduation rate etc. we therefore need a > decisive leadershipo that will share these challnges with stakeholders and > make everybody understand the State of the Institution. For this part, i > agree that EMC under Prof Tyobeka has failed dismally to lead that process > of pulling forces together. > > In the final analysis, my view is that Goverment should review the merger > process. We also need a focus infrastructural program of revamping > Historically disadvantaged campuses. > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks Cde Tsholo for raising such a discussion. >> >> TUT is as a result of merger of three former technikons, namely TNG, TNW >> and Pretoria Tech. one of the fundamental basis of its establishment was >> sharing of resources that were mainly centered in historically >> advantaged >> Pretoria Technikon. In my view, this was meant to redress the injustices >> of the past. It was therefore important to use a weighted average method >> on realigning these resources including human resource capital. >> >> What we have seen, since 2004, is a reactionary management that wanted >> to >> abuse the space of newness and divert the focus from redress to a >> totally >> new beginning. Decision affecting both students and employees were so >> reactionary that ever since its establishment, there were industrial >> actions in the beginning and mid year or towards the end of the year. >> >> The appointment of professor Tyobeka did not assist anyhow. He became a >> worse monster to a newly born institution of higher learning. He runs >> TUT >> like his home. He takes unilateral decision. The Phasha-led SRC did not >> agree with Torpography as it is implemented now. The Arthur-led SRC >> tried >> but in vain to reverse the Topography. >> >> Graduation ceremonies are held in two of the six campuses each year >> costing the graduates a fortune to attend what should be their >> celebration >> for their hard fought achievement. This is done in the name of economic >> viability and saving consciousness at the expense of students. >> >> The union agreed with a "Match and Place" process of integrating >> employees >> who fell outside of the agreed TUT structure. Its implementation sucks, >> employees are technically demoted through this process because there is >> a >> reduction in salaries. Senior officials are only placed in the Pretoria >> campus. Worse of them all is that the campuses in Mpumalanga and Limpopo >> are still treated as satellite campuses while the IOP regards all >> campuses >> as equal. >> >> In 2007, employees entered into a strike in July/August. The threat of >> closing down the institution was there until students joined the strike >> (solely to end it). Instead of 9.5% increase they resolved on 9.45% >> which >> is an insignificant difference that could have not taken the strike to >> the >> two weeks period it lasted. >> >> I believe that the only solution to that institution is a voluntary >> resignation of Prof Tyobeka, Prof Nevhutalu and Ms Mashabela. They are a >> team of reactionary forces within TUT. I suppose they take mandate from >> someone within the department. I suspect Ms Naledi Pandor shalll follow >> them as they leave our developmental centre. >> >> Amandla!! >> >>>>> <[email protected]> 11/02/2009 08:24 >>> >> >> Comrades i am a proud graduate of TUT and whats happening right know >> breaks my heart. and i want tyo appeal to all comrades who feel as i do >> about the issues to start a progressive discussion which will end up in >> us >> taking some action! >> >> i must ofcoz make ny plea clear, i think that comrades who served in the >> SRC and broader student leadership structure between 2001 & 2004 are >> best >> placed to assist, no offence to anybody else and this does not limit >> others to assist, i mean all those of u(us) who at soem point or another >> were involved in the MMT's will have better background. >> >> Oh comrade this is not a platform for us to start question each others >> credentials, so i dont expect any comrades to blame comrades from other >> campus for 'saling out' - wat ever that means. or for comrades to accuse >> previous student leadership for lacking decisive. >> >> all of the above are important to note and remember but they cant and >> wont >> be of any help in what needs to be done! >> >> So lets all put our heads together as some of us are not willing to seat >> by and let TUT close doors! Even if it means we take to the street! >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm >> >> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments relating to official business of the >> Mpumalanga Provincial Government (MPG) is proprietary to the MPG and >> intended for the original addressee only. >> The message may contain information that is confidential and subject to >> legal privilege. Any views expressed in this message are those of the >> individual sender. >> >> If you receive this message in error, please notify the original sender >> immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the >> intended >> recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not >> disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in connection >> therewith. >> >> The MPG cannot insure that the integrity of this communication has been >> maintained, nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception and / >> or >> interference. The MPG is not liable whatsoever for loss or damage >> resulting from the opening of this message and / or attachments and / or >> the use of the information contained in this message and / or >> attachments. >> > > > > ------------------------------------------- > South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm > > ------------------------------------------- South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za ------------------------------------------------------------------ For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
