I think we need to provide clarity here such that people should understand the 
functioning of the sphere of Governance (national, Provincial and Local). You 
see comrades it is within the constitutional provision for supply of basic 
services. However Municipalities are required to develop the indigent policies 
on how this basic services should accessed. In this process public hearing and 
held before the Bylaws are passed. It is important to provide this background 
such that we could not just send wrong aspersion that we are making empty 
promises relating to basic services. One of the pillar of our priority is the 
rollout of Infrastructure services relating to Water, Energy, Transport and 
Logistics to ensure that this services are provided to the correct people 
(Indigent). You see the principle which the ANC accept is that among us there 
are people who are supposed to pay for this services and there are those that 
should enjoy the Free Services (Water, Electricity, etc). For example at 
national level the policy talks to provision of 50KWh per months as free basic 
electricity (Minimum Standard) but the Local Sphere depending on its capacity 
may elect to increase just like what City of Tshwane did and increase to 100KWh 
per month. This was done through their own Indigent policy.

The same analogy, tell me that the City of Jo'burg has an Indigent Policy which 
states the level of intervention it ought to provide to its own citizen. The 
issue here is that this are Local government Jurisdiction areas and these 
services could only be provided by the Local Government or an Agency through an 
Executive Decision of Council. The Local Government System Act make such a 
requirement (Law) not of the ANC but of the Country and in the process to the 
development of such laws we are all encourage to make submissions. I am 
presenting my point to say this are the unintended consequences of our own 
laws. What you see happening is Electricity is that it cannot be stored and 
water can be but unfortunately, people in the development of their areas 
Indigent policies are not taking into account the size of a Family Household, 
which differ from Peri-Urban, Urban, Township and Rural Areas. Because what the 
Judgement fails to clarify is whether 50 litre is enough for a Household of 
Seven people of for two people? To me the issue is not the magnitude of the 
water to be distributed, it is the potential risk of trying to apply a one size 
fit all approach when providing this service.The question is why Tshwane on 
Electricity provided a differentiated approach? Why Jo'burg cannot develop its 
own policy that recognise the vast difference in culture across its own area of 
supply?

After painting such a background I think I could also present that the road 
towards a better life for all could not be easier one. The infrastructure to 
ensure that those services are provided is not there. We highly depend on the 
Lesotho Highland dam for the Supply and only the State facilitate such 
Transaction in which uMgeni Waters, Jo'burg Water and other Bulk Supplier of 
Water could trade and sell this water to our Local Sphere. The process which I 
am presenting is that we( ANC) or State does not own any of this Agencies but 
are Shareholders to enable that the price remain as low as possible.  The other 
realisation and not based on untested propaganda for Cholera is that we proud 
that in this country you could move to a tap and got drinkable water which is 
the opposite in most Developing and other Industrialised Countries. My take 
being that the answer to provide such service is not as easier is done. Beside, 
how will you tell if you are providing such services if you cannot measure 
that.  There is no way that Jo'burg could go public and claim we are providing 
free basic water and when we ask where can we measure such  and not able to get 
a an answer. The Judge who declare prepaid meters  illegal was drunk and 
Science tell that tomorrow another group of Citizen could claim we are not 
provided with services due to the fact that there are no measurements. Beside 
Jo'burg should report on how it uses it Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) 
allocation relating to Bulk Services and that accounted in terms of quantity 
delivered and the cost it has costed to deliver and what revenue was collected 
to affording and what was used for Indigent and at What Cross-Subsidy level was 
that done?  It is this same reasons we are providing that the City of Jo'burg 
has to explore before implementing and are these reason that led them to 
challenge the court ruling.

The point relating to Privatisation, is an ideological on its own and we could 
engage until relating to the path South Africa took to avoid a total collapse 
of the State and its own Agencies. I think it was correct to partially 
privatise in order to raise Capital from Offshore Markets  but keep the State 
intervention on course using the Shareholding Compact with these Agencies. I 
would like you to tell us how do you suggest the State to get Water from 
Lesotho, Inga (DRC) without laying Pipelines that requires massive capital 
Injection and at the same time fight with other pillars of Poverty? I would 
further like to be clarified as to who should pay for these services? The Tax 
Payers or the users of the Services? What Government interventions measures 
should be employed towards Indigent Citizens? I am possing these questions to 
illustrate the complexity of arriving at the simple solution which is not open 
for challenge by others. I am not prepared to pay for water to be used by Eskom 
in its own Generation Business but I am prepared to pay for Electricity price 
that recognise the Cost of Primary Energy. I am not prepared to pay for water 
used elsewhere but for the water I used and then the price if its high, should 
cross-subsidise the Indigent. The approach you raise here assume that all of us 
should pay for the services even if we do not have such services through Tax, 
which in unacceptable.
Hence this Cholera issue is unfounded and could not be used to justify the 
point here in actual fact is out of context. I hardly buy bottled water for 
drinking and drink from the tap like most of my Villagers people does and there 
is no Cholera. What I find very problematic in this piece of document is the 
fact that there is no mentioning of what people from Rural area are exposed to 
when they could spend a week without water from the tap which is the main cause 
of Cholera not running water which people in cities enjoy. Hence my point is 
that we should give our government space to implement its Infrastructure 
rollout programme and then evaluate. 

After my own analogy, I do not think we should want to enter into a debate that 
seeks to assume that our own ANC  promise for FBE, FBAE and FWater is correct. 
The ANC in the process leading to the development of our Manifesto, which what 
we are promising people was based on what people said we should prioritise and 
as such, Water Access, we have reached 88% and Electricity 80% and in terms of 
Access to free portion of this services we are 60%. Hence you could not see 
them being major priority. What is our priority is to Guarantee Supply of these 
services. Hence in doing so we should embark on the rollout of Infrastructure 
to enable us to provide Qualitative services. Hence this campaign should be 
directed at the respective Local Government Sphere (Jo'burg) and not elevated 
to national Status. Because Nationally the Stats could tell you that we are 
progressing well.
An Agenda that seeks to divert our immediate task of ensuring a decisive 
Victory is mislocated.

I remain,

-- 
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail 
legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. 
The full disclaimer details can be found at 
http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, 
and is believed to be clean.  MailScanner thanks Transtec Computers for their 
support.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to