I agree. Let's close this debate and start it at a correct moment.

On 7/17/09, Dalton Dan Gama <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Comrades i will like to agree with cde Sandile Ngcobo when he says that let
> us pause on disscussing the succession debate moving forward. Really now the
> debate is continuing here in the forum more than in the outside public where
> it initially started and week after another comrades are busy perpetuating
> it to further extents please leaders let us just avoid this attempt of
> ill-desciplined senior leaders in the ANC and not entertain them,
>
> On this one comrades:
>
> Radialism is intect, Amandla!!!
>
>
>  On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Alex M. Mashilo <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Dear comrade Floyd,
>>
>> I would really like to take the debate on succession further. I did not
>> have access to internet over the past few days, because of relaying between
>> cities in the EU.
>>
>> It's clear that our representation of historical facts does not have
>> substantial differences. The point of discussion is whether Cosatu is
>> correct to have expressed its position about comrade JZ continuing as the
>> President of both the ANC and the country in 2012 and 1214 respectively. The
>> YCL has since supported Cosatu's position. The YL comdemned the move by both
>> Cosatu and the YCL, stating that it's too early to debate the matter
>> presently.
>>
>> You have said that you are a member of both the YCL and the YL, serve in
>> both the NC and the NEC of both organisations, and up hold the two
>> positions.
>>
>> I too, am a member of both the YCL and the YL, and currently serving, by
>> virtue of being provincial secretary of the YCL, in the NC; I served in the
>> REC of the YL in the period of our 22nd National Conference; and, presently,
>> I'm based full time in Cosatu's affiliate, NUMSA, on a full time basis. I
>> don't really think that credentials are so important that we can
>> concerntrate on them and risk abondoning the real, substantive debate,
>> succession.
>>
>> You are saying that you don't have a position personally on the succession
>> debate, but that you uphold both the positions of the YL and the YCL. There
>> is a theoritical basis to your position, that of democratic centralism; but
>> there is absolutely no theoritical articulation. The positions by both the
>> YL and the YCL, I would take it as a given, were arrived at after real,
>> living human individuals expressed their positions in considering the matter
>> and arrived at conclusions. That's the starting point. And I wish to openly
>> state that, in this context, I do have a position on this matter. Secondly,
>> the YL differs with the YCL. Please, can you explain how in practice are you
>> carrying out both the two differing positions. This will help me understand
>> your theoritical articulation, which I just said, you did not articulate.
>> Having heard you on this point I'll restate my position.
>>
>> Cosatu and the YCL are right to express their views right now, JZ must
>> continue in 2012 and 2014 respectively. That's my position now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>        -----Original Message-----
>>        From: Nyiko Floyd Shivambu [mailto:[email protected]]
>>        Sent: Mon 7/6/2009 8:53 PM
>>        To: [email protected]
>>
>>        Cc:
>>        Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Succession debate - the problems of
>> short memory
>>
>>
>>
>>        Let's discuss. What are the issues..... I was merely extracting
>> facts from history in order to enrich the discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to