*FLAME ON* Well, I'm sure we all know that KDE is a much better choice for an environment then GNOME, especially if you want to be able to set defaults and/or restrict access to things. :-)
On Thursday 07 April 2005 09:31 am, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote: > NBD... Let me put it into perspective: It is not a show stopper. > > GNOME-2.10.0.x can be configured to build against mozilla rather than > firefox. However..., the gnomes [those wee folk that create the GNOME > desktop ???] have moved on to firefox. > > -Joseph > > ====================================================================== > > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:19, Andrew Zschetzsche wrote: > > Ahh, I have been corrected. ;) > > > > I'd have to try a RPM from Fedora's 3.90 testing build, as that has > > Gnome 2.10 beta. If that doesn't work, I'm out; I'd have no idea as to > > what goes where. > > > > --Andy > > > > On Apr 7, 2005, at 8:56 AM, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote: > > > Answer: > > > > > > rpm -ql mozilla-devel > > > > > > If you wish to build any other application that is based upon firefox, > > > e.g. epiphany-1.6, you will need the firefox equivalents of the include > > > files, libraries, etc. listed above. The current "stable" branch of > > > GNOME, 2.10.0.x, uses now uses firefox rather than mozilla. > > > > > > The mozilla install on YDL contains: > > > > > > mozilla-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-chat-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-mail-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-nspr-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-nss-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.3-2.ydl.1 > > > > > > > > > You should carefully review this list and decide which of these are > > > relevant to creating a developer environment for firefox. > > > > > > -Joseph > > > > > > ======================================================================= > > > =========== > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:32, Richard June wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 08:27, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote: > > >>> It would be useful if there were also a firefox-devel, just like > > >>> mozilla-devel. > > >> > > >> Uhm, what would you want in firefox-devel? > > > > > > -- > > > joseph_sacco[at]comcast[dot]net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > yellowdog-general mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general > > > HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com' _______________________________________________ yellowdog-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
