On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Rhet Turnbull wrote:

If Yojimbo stored records as separate files and kept metadata and/or
index data in smaller DBs then the backup regime would only have to
backup those files that had changed instead of the entire xxxMB
sqllite file that Yojimbo uses now. I believe that would decrease the
risk of inconsistency as opposed to the case now, where Yojimbo could
write the the large database file while the backup is trying to copy it.

I'm sure Bare Bones has considered this option for Yojimbo. But I suspect there's greater complexity here than meets the eye. Perhaps there are tradeoffs having to do with record encryption or .Mac sync. Would we be willing to sacrifice those features for individual file storage?


This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list <yojimbo-talk@barebones.com>.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List archives:  <http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso>
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working correctly? Please send mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to