On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 06:10:24PM +0400, Yuri Bushmelev wrote : > 2010/10/28 Franck L <fra...@kernlog.net>: > > i noticed that at everyboot, it set back the hwclock to 1-1-1970, which > > make my zaurus make fsck.ext3 at everyboot. > > So, i switched back to linux-kexecboot-2.6.34-rc4 , which not have this > > problem. > > I'm sure this is kernel problem.. it was a problem from me, sorry ; see my reply to Andrea.
> > > less important : for the 2.6.2x-new-gui, i don't know if it's me, but > > the choice is a little hard in "sunlight", because the contrast between > > the chosen line (white) and the others choices (light grey) isn't > > enough. > > Yes, this is known problem. I'll change colors to be more contrast. ok, thank you :) > > > the device scan is long i think. but it might be normal ? > > NAND scanning takes most part of time. If you have nothing useful in > NAND then just erase it with mtd-utils. > i'll give it a try ; that's right, i never used the NAND i think, or maybe to reinstall cacko when things want to bad with u-boot. but it was a long time ago. > > i was wondering... would it be hard to add a little console entry, to be > > able to log, in order to make some tasks ; for example, mounting hdd and > > sd card, in order to put a new/old kexecboot on the SD to reflash the > > kexecboot, resetting hwclock in kexecboot (...) > > but would it be a good idea ? > > Well.. I have thinking about this regularly. But you can just boot > e.g. console-image from some media.. i'm gonna advocate for the console entry in kexecboot ; here is why. * i do not have a SD card dedicated for another system (like a quick console-image), so everytime i need to use another system to rescue, i have to pick the SD from my camera, save all, format, install the image, boot on it (...). i could buy one you will tell me :) * for some new-kernel testing, if the new kernel fails to run correctly, it would be more quick to just log from kexecboot, mount and change the ln -s in the /boot entry to try another image, (and maybe rescan from kexecboot after) instead of booting an other image, mount the fs with erroneous boot entry, ln -s zImage, reboot... * for other minor change like the ln -s told above (change fstab...) same as above. I totally understand that it could make the kexecboot too heavy, more longer to start... I'm also aware that it could become a time eater for you to make it happens, especially if i'm the only person who would occasionnaly use it. I wonder what other people think. i just told why i would prefer with the console, i'm open and curious about other people opinion. Thank you for all :) Franck > > -- > Yuri Bushmelev > > _______________________________________________ > Zaurus-devel mailing list > Zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel _______________________________________________ Zaurus-devel mailing list Zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel
