Wow.  What have I been doing?  I know I thought this when I was 
first picking algorithms and tried to do just that on a 2x2x2 and it 
didn't work.  I must have messed up somewhere along the way and have 
been ignoring perfectly good algorithms ever since.  Thanks,  I've 
got some things to look over again now.

--- In, "Bob Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, for the 2x2, you would simply ignore slices and
> double-layer turns become normal layer-turns.  Hence, when I use 
> for the 2x2, the M' U2 in the beginning is ignored, and I actually
> start with the two matching stickers on the right side instead. :)
> ~ Bob
> --- In, "mgwallisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >
> > Thanks,  guys.  I'm much better off now.  I'm going with 
> > feels much smoother than what I was doing,  though I liked the M 
> > turns of Bob's, but I forgot to mention why I want to stay away 
> > the double layer turns.  I'm also using COLL for the 2x2x2.  I 
> > it's not going to be optimal,  but it's just a diversion so a 
> > extra moves isn't too big of deal.  Thanks again.
> > 
> > Matt
> >

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to