--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Smart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2006 DaveK, in response to Ian, wrote:
> >--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "rbs000" <ijohanso@> wrote:
> >> It's a "stretch" all right. I find the "Buddhism teaches the same
> >> thing as Christianity" idea an exercise in political correctness
> >> is corrosive to the teachings in both traditions. They get
> >> down to the least common denomonator. I think we should just let
> >> each tradition speak for itself.
> >> Ian
> >I think your viewpoint is unfortunate.
> For a change, I agree with both of you.
Apologies for being presumptuous, but it appears you are saying this
to appear diplomatic. Do you think I am corrupting Buddhism and
Christianity out of some need to be politically correct? I can not
see how you could hold this opinion at the same time as the one
you've expressed below.
> I think by earnestly following the teachings of both Christianity
> Buddhism (and perhaps in fact most religions) you will eventually
> the same place.
> Their teaching concepts and methods are different, sometimes even
> contradictory; but I cannot help but think the fundamental
> their founders (in this case Jesus and Buddha) were the same. This
> because that fundamental realization is a universal human (sentient
> attribute and available to all.
> This is what I want to believe anyway.
"The truth is one, the sages call it by many names." Say the Hindu
something or other's.
It's just different language to say the same thing. I happen to
believe the language of Christianity is less direct, and leads a lot
of people astray, following abstractions rather than following
skillful actions. But by looking at all the traditions that are out
there, the common thread emerges, and you can see what was intended.
Their realization was the same, but Jesus had to express his
realization in the theology he had available to him at the time,
which was the Old Testament.
Remember the phrase "all sentient beings" and consider carefully what
that means. That means everybody. Everybody is everybody. Lots of
people, isn't it? They're not all going to convert to Buddhism. So
what's a Bodhisattva to do? We could start a Dharma-Jihad and try to
convert everybody to Buddhism. Wanna start a new organization of
Buddhist fundamentalists and start blowing stuff up?
I prefer to find the common ground and break down the barriers of
communication, get over all the pointless bitterness and
divisiveness, and get over ourselves. It's much slower than a Jihad
but that's my choice.
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: