ED,
 
I am led to believe you think 'zen' is unethical.
 
Anthony

--- On Mon, 21/2/11, ED <[email protected]> wrote:


From: ED <[email protected]>
Subject: [Zen] Re: An Article of Interest
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 21 February, 2011, 10:28 PM


  






 
Bill,
I rarely if ever criticize 'hypocrisy" as it is an unconscious but normal and 
natural aspect of all humans and human groups.
The only difference I perceive between zen and Zen is a non-concern for good 
motivation and a non-focus on ethical behavior in zen as compared with Zen.
--ED
 
--- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@...> wrote:
>
ED,

I just want to make clear that I think when you are talking about this article
and about 'Zen' in general that you are referring to Zen Buddhism. The reason I
want to emphaize this is that I think your justificable criticism and examples
of hypocricy are the result of the Buddhist layers of this, not zen itself.

...Bill!


> Hi Steve,
>
> Zen, like most religious or spiritual paths and practices is riddled
> with unstated or unexamined assumptions and ambiguities. The article
> facilitates the task of identifying them.
>
> --ED

 
> > Hi ED. While I certainly did find the article interesting, I am
> not likely to start chanting a mantra to it, like the Nichiren people
> do with the Lotus Sutra.
> Steve







Reply via email to