Edgar:
 
Responding with another question is a way of running away of a question or 
evading a question addressed. I know that your posting was objective but you 
have to admit if not in public at least to yourself that posting was incomplete 
as there was not mention of the other side impact of victims of rape. And as 
for your question about me having a brother who will be a rapist...I sincerely 
wouldn't know how I would react in front of that.  I don't entirely know myself 
but the little I may know myself I do know that It will upset me very badly to 
have a rapist brother.  And as for the action to take against my own 
brother...It's hard to say just here under theory what I would do or 
not.  You'll be in agreement that there is not way to know that if one doesn't 
have a brother in the first place.  But just in case, out of imaging that I had 
one, then there is guarantee that that would have an strong impact on me in the 
form of shock and deep
 psychological pain.  I'm not confident enough to know what else will be 
reacting after having found out that I have a rapist brother. 
 
Mayka

--- On Thu, 24/2/11, Edgar Owen <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Can A Buddha Harm Others?
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 24 February, 2011, 0:05


  



Hi Mayka, 


Well, how about if the rapist was your brother or husband? I'm discussing the 
issue objectively not personally. One doesn't have to always inject a personal 
dimension to everything. Doing so can become an attachment which Zen tells us 
to avoid as an impediment to realization. Billions of horrible things happen to 
people and animals every day. That is the way the world works. The Zen person 
acts compassionately in his own life but analyzes events objectively rather 
than personalizing events that happen elsewhere. That's what I'm trying to do. 


Edgar







On Feb 23, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Maria Lopez wrote:


  






Edgar:
 
All this sounds thoughtful while reading  but incomplete as there is no mention 
or comment about both physical and mental wounds inflicted over the women the 
rapist left behind.  There is no mention either of any of the consequences over 
the life of that particular woman who was raped and  the impact of being raped 
may have.  And of course there is nothing about a dear female member closed to 
you being raped and how you would react.  How about if the raped one was your 
little sister?
 
Mayka
 
 
--- On Wed, 23/2/11, Edgar Owen <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Can A Buddha Harm Others?
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 23 February, 2011, 20:56


  

Kristy, 


Good objective comments. Rape fantasies are indeed common among women, though 
of course these are invariably about really appealing lusty guys who won't take 
no for an answer rather than men that the woman isn't attracted to as may well 
be the case in actual rapes. The cure for rape is of course for the potential 
rapist to have a woman who satisfies all his desires voluntarily. If this is 
the case he has no need to go elsewhere on any terms. Unfortunately few women 
know how to provide this to a man. It's not just about providing ordinary sex, 
but fulfilling his deepest psychological needs as a man as well.


Throughout history rape has been quite common and everyone of us is almost 
certainly the descendant of one or more rapes in their ancestry. From an 
evolutionary perspective rape is quite natural and is an excellent strategy to 
maximize one's genetic legacy - if one can get away with it. As ED's article 
points out this is usually only the case in when the woman in question is not 
under the protection of male family members as is usually the case in 
traditional societies. In modern western societies the state has usurped male 
protection of women which makes them more vulnerable to rape.


Men were given a very strong natural desire to have sex with attractive women 
at almost any cost if they can manage it. The genes that give that impetus have 
been strengthened because such men tend to leave more descendants carrying 
those genes. Every man has at least some desire to rape women he can't get 
otherwise though that desire is usually tempered by an equally strong survival 
instinct. Men of course have strong rape fantasies as well. These often take 
the form of the woman he rapes realizing how wonderful he is and falling head 
over heels in love with him because he is such a great lover whether he 
actually is or not!


Edgar







On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Kristy McClain wrote:


  






Edgar is indeed correct.  It can be "comforting"  to believe that the incentive 
is  power--hatred of women and the like.  But the evidence, and the report from 
rapists themselves, is that it is indeed  about sex.  Though other factors 
co-exist. 
 
10 years ago, i was moderating a rape-fantasy discussion board, as part of a 
training exercise.  A clinical psychologist  in NY was running a group for male 
sex offenders who were in prison.  We had many discussions on this, and the 
consenses was  in agreement with this article.  The psychologist running the 
group was--himself  drawn to  the  act of rape as a sexual drive.  He told me 
that the best gift his wife gave him was the  acceptance she offered him when 
he confessed this to her. She  even offered to role-play a rape scene with him, 
but he refused.  He told me that he felt it might  get out of hand. 
 
Its  easy to label these men as  monsters as a means to deny their right to 
even exist.  Brand them.  Shun them.   But they do exist, and have since the 
dawn of man.  If we are all "one", we can only hope to heal  if everyone is 
included in the process.  
 
I may hate child abusers.. but I remember that more often than not, they were 
abused too. 
 
btw..  There are many, many females who have rape fantasies, as part of their 
erotic responses. 
 
Remember.. I recognize this is a polarizing topic.  I'm not denying the 
experience rape has on unwilling females.  I'm just offering another 
perspective because the only way to ever hope to  prevent or heal  the problem, 
is to look at it with a clear mirror.
 
Edgar,
 
What does the data show on rape when it is done in countries as part of 
geneocide?
 
Kristy


--- On Wed, 2/23/11, Edgar Owen <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Can A Buddha Harm Others?
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2011, 8:08 AM


  

Rape is primarily about satisfying sexual desire when it can't be achieved 
otherwise. Complete power over a woman can be a very strong aphrodisiac. 
Especially where violence or injury is involved it can also be combined with 
the man's desire for revenge against women for perceived psychological injury 
previously suffered at the hands of a woman or women in general by the rapist. 


Edgar





On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:45 AM, ED wrote:


  




Hi Audrey -
Yours is an assertion that conforms to the usual feminist position. It may be 
true or it may not. Has the truth of the assertion been confirmed by say 
neurophysiologists and neuropsychologists?
Thanks, ED
 

--- In [email protected], "audreydc1983" <audreydc1983@...> wrote:
>
> I will beg to differ on one point: Rape has little to do with sexual desire. 
> It is about power, control, and victimization.
> Those of us who believe sex is a natural product of lust, sexual desire, and 
> love often will assume that rape, since it is a sexual act, is associated in 
> some way with these feelings. 
> This assumption couldn't be further from the truth. If there is any desire in 
> rape, it is the desire to control/victimize. 
> 
> ~Audrey










Reply via email to