Joe, Those who separated and discriminated 'chi' from Just THIS! did not do so because they were 'sensitive'. They did so because they were dualistic.
...Bill! --- In [email protected], "Joe" <desert_woodworker@...> wrote: > > Bill, it has a name because sensitive people gave it a name. > > This does not mean it is special. > > Just as Bill, or Bill! is not special. > > Or is he? > > Of course he is. > > --Joe > > PS Sheng Yen occasionally spoke of "samadhi-power". Not of Chi. Nor of > Joriki (well he was Chinese, and would not have used that term, except > academically). Many of us, but not all, understood "samadhi-power"'s > signification. ;-) > > > "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote: > > > 'When one concentrates and directs his efforts we call that 'joriki'. > > 'Joriki' is not something special or even something in-and-of itself or > > even something at all. It's just a name we give to and action we do. > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
