Joe, 

Thanks for indulging me and doing such a good job of putting into words what 
understandably can't truly be expressed in words. Nice style, too. You've 
certainly given me lots to grapple with, so if I tend to wander, please employ 
your ox-herding skills to rein me in ; )  You will, I hope, appreciate that I'm 
not trying to argue that vipassana is better, or more effective, than Zen, or 
that my view is right and yours is wrong... ... ... It's a path that has been 
practiced for thousands of years and has seen many practioners liberated. If I 
want a pissing contest, I could just argue that the UK's 'Office' is better 
than the US' 'Office' (which it is, by the way).


There seems to be quite a few definite differences, yet one fundamental 
similarity, between Zen and vipassana. I'd like to tackle at least one aspect 
of this. The similarity need not be discussed - liberation being empty of 
emptiness, never mind sectarianism. It is the differences in the path to 
liberation that interests me. As you know, vipassana is the pali forinsight 
meditation and so obviously this is essential for liberating wisdom. We use an 
object of meditation to look into how the mind creates attachments: clinging or 
aversion. All phenomena are seen as impermanent, devoid of self, and ultimately 
unsatisfying resulting in suffering. When we see into these 3 characteristics 
of existence, we liberate ourselves from a self who suffers: the suffering 
doesn't cease - the self does. The method used that leads us to liberation 
seems to be more structured, and gradual, than in Zen, but it is this major 
difference that has pulled me into vipassana. I
 breathe. I see that the breath arises and passes. I note that this produces an 
emotion or a thought. This feeling/thought, too, arises and passes. This sense 
of an 'I' who experiences these insights also arises and passes from moment to 
moment. How unsatisfying to try to attach to a solid, permanent 'I'! This 'I' 
is an illusion, empty. There is only non-self (maybe Descarte's meant, 'I 
think, therefore there are thoughts'??). And so on. Of course, the mind is not 
literally churning out thoughts like this every second - wouldn't want to be 
accused of 'monkey-mind', would we ; ) - it's much closer to intuition than 
that, although deduction/analysis does play a role. But it is also much more 
than just observing and letting all phenomena pass.


Of course, there are many more methods employed in vipassana including 
something very similar to shikantaza. There is of course the much misunderstood 
role of the jhanas. In fact, just so that I'm clear on this, the jhanas are not 
essential to liberation (although it can be argued that the suttas do suggest 
that they are), but they do support insight meditation by calming the mind and 
holding at bay the 5 Hindrances that, well, hinder meditation (restlessness, 
doubt, anger etc.). But it is the liberating wisdom from insight that frees us 
from the bondage of self and suffering. So, it just seems like there is a much 
clearer path to follow (but certainly no easier) in vipassana than in Zen. This 
suits some, but not others. I like what Kris said about Zen not relying on the 
sutras, but not abandoning them either. I'm grateful for the sutras. They not 
only show me how to meditate, but also tell me what to expect along the way (as 
well as some ecstatic
 surprises), and deliver on that promise. Instead of a vague notion of 
compassion/morality in Zen (forgive me if that's not true for you, but even 
well established Zen teachers have said the same), vipassana/Buddhism, make it 
explicit in the form of the Noble Eightfold Path. There are many layers of 
interpretation of the NEP, from it being a description of a single moment in 
meditation - to the description of a Buddha. But it can also be interpreted 
fundamentally as a guide towards how to live life so as to be conducive to 
meditation (we all know how taking an oath on retreat helps calm our mind 
before we even sit on the cushion). That's where I'm at. If mindful of these 
(explicit) precepts, the basis for keeping the meditative mind can be kept 
alive every moment of the day, but especially for the concentration required 
for deeper samadhi and/or insight meditation. Hope you kept reading up to this 
point!

Mike 

Reply via email to