372 Joseph Goldstein Dharma Talks:

http://www.dharmaseed.org/teacher/96/?page=2
<http://www.dharmaseed.org/teacher/96/?page=2>



--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
>
> Thanks for indulging me and doing such a good job of putting into
words what understandably can't truly be expressed in words. Nice style,
too. You've certainly given me lots to grapple with, so if I tend to
wander, please employ your ox-herding skills to rein me in ; )  You
will, I hope, appreciate that I'm not trying to argue that vipassana is
better, or more effective, than Zen, or that my view is right and yours
is wrong... ... ... It's a path that has been practiced for thousands of
years and has seen many practioners liberated. If I want a pissing
contest, I could just argue that the UK's 'Office' is better than the
US' 'Office' (which it is, by the way).
>
>
> There seems to be quite a few definite differences, yet one
fundamental similarity, between Zen and vipassana. I'd like to tackle at
least one aspect of this. The similarity need not be discussed -
liberation being empty of emptiness, never mind sectarianism. It is the
differences in the path to liberation that interests me. As you know,
vipassana is the pali forinsight meditation and so obviously this is
essential for liberating wisdom. We use an object of meditation to look
into how the mind creates attachments: clinging or aversion. All
phenomena are seen as impermanent, devoid of self, and ultimately
unsatisfying resulting in suffering. When we see into these 3
characteristics of existence, we liberate ourselves from a self who
suffers: the suffering doesn't cease - the self does. The method used
that leads us to liberation seems to be more structured, and gradual,
than in Zen, but it is this major difference that has pulled me into
vipassana. I
> breathe. I see that the breath arises and passes. I note that this
produces an emotion or a thought. This feeling/thought, too, arises and
passes. This sense of an 'I' who experiences these insights also arises
and passes from moment to moment. How unsatisfying to try to attach to a
solid, permanent 'I'! This 'I' is an illusion, empty. There is only
non-self (maybe Descarte's meant, 'I think, therefore there are
thoughts'??). And so on. Of course, the mind is not literally churning
out thoughts like this every second - wouldn't want to be accused of
'monkey-mind', would we ; ) - it's much closer to intuition than that,
although deduction/analysis does play a role. But it is also much more
than just observing and letting all phenomena pass.
>
>
> Of course, there are many more methods employed in vipassana including
something very similar to shikantaza. There is of course the much
misunderstood role of the jhanas. In fact, just so that I'm clear on
this, the jhanas are not essential to liberation (although it can be
argued that the suttas do suggest that they are), but they do support
insight meditation by calming the mind and holding at bay the 5
Hindrances that, well, hinder meditation (restlessness, doubt, anger
etc.). But it is the liberating wisdom from insight that frees us from
the bondage of self and suffering. So, it just seems like there is a
much clearer path to follow (but certainly no easier) in vipassana than
in Zen. This suits some, but not others. I like what Kris said about Zen
not relying on the sutras, but not abandoning them either. I'm grateful
for the sutras. They not only show me how to meditate, but also tell me
what to expect along the way (as well as some ecstatic
> surprises), and deliver on that promise. Instead of a vague notion of
compassion/morality in Zen (forgive me if that's not true for you, but
even well established Zen teachers have said the same),
vipassana/Buddhism, make it explicit in the form of the Noble Eightfold
Path. There are many layers of interpretation of the NEP, from it being
a description of a single moment in meditation - to the description of a
Buddha. But it can also be interpreted fundamentally as a guide towards
how to live life so as to be conducive to meditation (we all know how
taking an oath on retreat helps calm our mind before we even sit on the
cushion). That's where I'm at. If mindful of these (explicit) precepts,
the basis for keeping the meditative mind can be kept alive every moment
of the day, but especially for the concentration required for deeper
samadhi and/or insight meditation. Hope you kept reading up to this
point!
>
> Mike
>


Reply via email to