Speaking for Al, the forum owner, and both the moderators, Edgar and me, we all 
hope you stay.  We get a commission on each post and your membership here has 
already moved up the date of my retirement by several weeks...

...Bill! 

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  right..edgar..maybe this zen is not for me...why are you saying crazy new 
> age fantasy?
> 
> ...there are plenty of practises of a human kind that believe in nature and 
> nature's spirits...communicating with nature. e.g australian aborigines
> .it is not new fangled dangled...
>  merle.
> .worshipping and communicating with the sun this morning at 6:30am
> 
>   
> Merle,
> 
> Reread paragraph 4 Merle. I said nothing of the sort... I was talking about 
> incorrect facts, not the spiritual awe of reality. 
> 
> Do you understand the difference? You don't have to think the flower 
> understands what you say to it to appreciate the flower. Zen is realizing and 
> appreciating the TRUE nature of the flower, not some crazy New Age fantasy 
> facts you project onto it.
> 
> Edgar
> 
> On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Merle Lester wrote:
> 
> > thank you for your clarification edgar
> > 
> > ..remind me never to see the poetry in the dancing daffodil or  listen to 
> > the music that the leaves on the trees sing.
> > ..remind me i must be ever vigilant unless i fall from grace and am reduced 
> > to praise and awe and wonder at the beauty of mother nature especially her 
> > most glorious of all...her sexual delights in the form of flowers never 
> > again to listen to their  glorious voices
> > 
> > ..remind me that i must always remain ever scientific ever logical and 
> > alert to childish silly fantasy games and illusions..
> > never  again must i listen to the wind and the grasses when they speak.
> > ..goodness me and oh jesus christ ..what would the red skin indian say  to 
> > your theories edgar?
> > 
> > ...edgar save me from such silly ways
> > ..for life is not a bowl of cherries
> >  it is hard  real world made from solid rock..solid knowledge based on 
> > facts and figures
> > ..and if one dare to fall and fall to such fancies as projecting a human 
> > quality to a plant life and me daring to speak plant language..strike me 
> > dumb
> >  so i may never speak again of such unheard things..
> > 
> > ... merle..the wolf  carrying a bright yellow daffodil as a peace offering 
> > to those who know what sitting bull would have replied
> > 
> > 
> > Joe,
> > 
> > Flowers do have 'senses' in the sense that they have receptors for and 
> > respond to light, touch, chemical signals and possibly sound. They have 
> > fairly complex internal electrical and chemical signaling systems....
> > 
> > What I doubt is Merle's contention that her plants listen to her and 
> > respond to what she says.... There is no evolutionary reason they should do 
> > so and no scientific evidence that they do....
> > 
> > I'd say Merle is projecting here which is a dangerous form of illusion and 
> > the antithesis of Zen....
> > 
> > There is a subtle Zen point here. It's fine to have personal myths like 
> > this so long as one realizes they are just fun fantasy, games and illusion 
> > and NOT reality. Illusion recognized as illusion is reality, illusion seen 
> > as reality is illusion....
> > 
> > One of the most dangerous illusions to Zen is the various 'New Age' wishful 
> > thinking that falsely projects goody goody saccharin fake sweetness on 
> > reality. It's like astrology, numerology, anti-scientific religious 
> > delusions and the various forms of 'spiritualism' that all attempt to 
> > project the delusions of mind onto reality.
> > 
> > There is no realization so long as one is mired in these illusions...
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Joe wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> Glenn,
> >> 
> >> With respect, I *doubt* these "instrumental revelations".
> >> 
> >> I am a professional and an expert in Scientific Instrumentation, and I 
> >> have nothing but doubts about these botanical "experiments" that are so 
> >> often cited.  I believe they are BS; and, if you have a while, I can show 
> >> you exactly why.  Well, it may not be easy to get together.
> >> 
> >> But, keep a skeptical -- and an open -- mind, I suggest!
> >> 
> >> And don't be gullible.
> >> 
> >> As much as I love flowers, too.
> >> 
> >> --Joe
> >> 
> >>> "Glenn Rogers" <rgthiessen@> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> I saw a National Geographic program in which scientists hooked up ECG 
> >>> monitors to plant flowers. [snip]
> >> 
> >> 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to