Bill!,

A great instruction, and is certainly direct, but Joshu's instructions were 
given to a monk who had probably been practicing meditation for a long time and 
was already 'ripe' for awakening to happen. Imagine how useful that instruction 
would be to a neophyte coming off the street asking about the search for truth 
or something similar. Joshu's instruction is just that - an instruction. That's 
why i believe Buddha's skilful means (upaya) is so useful as a teaching method. 
On the one side we can have the direct pointing to the Dharma (Zen) and on the 
other we can have Therevada Buddhism with it's more step by step instructions, 
such as following the Noble eightfold Path. 

The Buddha was very wise to understand that there are many different kinds of 
people/cultures/personalities etc. out there and no one method will work for 
all. I think it should be clear now that "wash you bowls" just isn't going to 
work for someone like ED. If you agree, what else could you say that might help 
him?

Mike




________________________________
 From: Bill! <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 9:48
Subject: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
 

  
ED,

Mind if Joshu and I jump in?

"WASH YOUR BOWLS!"  That's how...Bill! (and Joshu)

--- In [email protected], "ED" <seacrofter001@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Edgar,
> 
> And how is this magic trick accomplished?
> 
> --ED
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >
> > ED,
> >
> > Stop practicing and just BE your Buddha Nature!
> >
> > Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> > > Edgar,
> > >
> > > Therefore, although each of us is complete, we need to practice
> > > diligently at all times with no objective in mind?
> > >
> > > --ED
> 
> 
> 
> > > > Joe and Merle,
> > > >
> > > > There is no 'goal' of enlightenment to be achieved without which
> you
> > > imagine you are incomplete....
> > > >
> > > > There is no incompleteness. This understanding is an essential
> aspect
> > > of realization...
> > > >
> > > > Wham!
> > > >
> > > > Edgar
>


 

Reply via email to