Realizing this, what lacks? *L*
KG
On 9/2/2012 7:35 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:
Mike,
Yes, the problem with these pithy 'in crowd' Zen sayings is that bowls
can be washed WITHOUT realization just as they can be WITH realization...
Edgar
On Sep 2, 2012, at 6:19 AM, mike brown wrote:
Bill!,
A great instruction, and is certainly direct, but Joshu's
instructions were given to a monk who had probably been practicing
meditation for a long time and was already 'ripe' for awakening to
happen. Imagine how useful that instruction would be to a neophyte
coming off the street asking about the search for truth or something
similar. Joshu's instruction is just that - an instruction. That's
why i believe Buddha's skilful means (upaya) is so useful as a
teaching method. On the one side we can have the direct pointing to
the Dharma (Zen) and on the other we can have Therevada Buddhism with
it's more step by step instructions, such as following the Noble
eightfold Path.
The Buddha was very wise to understand that there are many different
kinds of people/cultures/personalities etc. out there and no one
method will work for all. I think it should be clear now that "wash
you bowls" just isn't going to work for someone like ED. If you
agree, what else could you say that might help him?
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Bill! <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Sunday, 2 September 2012, 9:48
*Subject:* [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
ED,
Mind if Joshu and I jump in?
"WASH YOUR BOWLS!" That's how...Bill! (and Joshu)
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>, "ED" <seacrofter001@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Edgar,
>
> And how is this magic trick accomplished?
>
> --ED
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected]
<mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>, Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >
> > ED,
> >
> > Stop practicing and just BE your Buddha Nature!
> >
> > Edgar
>
>
>
> > > Edgar,
> > >
> > > Therefore, although each of us is complete, we need to practice
> > > diligently at all times with no objective in mind?
> > >
> > > --ED
>
>
>
> > > > Joe and Merle,
> > > >
> > > > There is no 'goal' of enlightenment to be achieved without which
> you
> > > imagine you are incomplete....
> > > >
> > > > There is no incompleteness. This understanding is an essential
> aspect
> > > of realization...
> > > >
> > > > Wham!
> > > >
> > > > Edgar
>
