Jim, This all sounds like a bunch of gobbedy-gook to me. For example I've never heard of a 'quantum theory of consciousness' nor do can I conceive of such a thing. Besides affirming to you that all of these concepts are illusory and even if they are discussed in some circle have nothing to do with Buddha Nature, I'll defer on the rest of this to Edgar and maybe Joe, and anyone else who wants to take it on.
...Bill! --- In [email protected], "jfnewell7" <jfnewell7@...> wrote: > > One:: I am assuming that since consciousness and the physical exchange > energy, they must have serious commonalities, such as having the same ground > or one being the ground of the other. > > Does this assumption seem reasonable? > > Two:: The expansion of space itself seems to be accelerating due to a not > understood cause called dark energy at the moment. > > My impression is that the acceleration in the expansion of space is orderly > to the point of seeming coordinated over a few billion light years. > > Does that in fact fit the astronomical data? > > Three:: The bending of space involves more stretching on the outside of the > curve than one the inside of a curve, which gravitational lensing involves > galaxies as well as smaller bodies. The bending seems to be orderly to the > point of seeming coordinated across on the order of as much as 100,000 light > years. > > Does this in fact fit the astronomical data? > > Four:: If the above processes are in fact orderly, how could that happen? > > Five:: To be able to expand and bend, space must have an adequately low > level of stiffness. > > Does this seem true? > > Six:: If space isn't stiff enough, it couldn't coordinate itself by a process > of or in space over the great distances noted above. If space were too stiff, > it couldn't expand and bend to begin with. > > Is there a level of space which could explain the orderliness over great > distances of the expansion and bending of space? If so, the analysis ends > here. If not, see below. > > Seven:: The quantum theory of consciousness holds that the effects propagate > faster than the speed of light. If that is true, then the quantum processes > transcend the aspect of space which involves the speed of light. > > Does that seem reasonable? > > Eight:: A transcendent process propagating faster than the speed of light > might be able to coordinate the expansion and bending of space even when > space could not coordinate its own expansion and bending over the long > distances discussed above. > > Does this seem like a reasonable possibility? > > Nine:: Such a quantum process is the only explanation I can see at the > moment, which tends to confirm it, but something new might be discovered in > the future. > > Does that seem to be reasonable? > > Ten: If the same quantum processes are involved with consciousness, which > involves the Buddha-nature, and also involves the expansion and bending of > space over long distances, then there is a deep connection between the > Buddha-nature and the expansion and bending of space over long distances. > > Does that logical step seem reasonable? > > Jim > ------------------------------------ Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
