Merle,

You and Edgar are like two peas in a pod...always assuming people think 
something they probably don't and certainly didn't say.

Who on this group said you were a zen teacher?  Only Edgar and you as far as I 
can remember.

Who on this group implied they did not believe you were a zen teacher? NO ONE 
to my knowledge.

I read the Zen Forum "...with my eyes wide open, my ears pricked and alert...".

When I shop, I shop.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  bill..i shop with my eyes wide open, my ears pricked and alert..
> 
> you'd betold surprised at the amazing conversations i have had with total 
> strangers who suddenly for no reason eagerly tell me their life stories..and 
> i point them to zen!
> 
>  i am a teacher after all which all of you in the group deny to me
> 
> merle
> 
>  merle
>   
> Merle,
> 
> When I go to the shopping mall I shop.  What do you do?
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> >
> > edgar.
> > 
> > .i can understand what you are saying...and that is how i see it except i 
> > cannot explain it like you have..
> > 
> > .zen to me is being in the moment alert and forever present...as i see it 
> > we zen through the day..
> > 
> > .practising zen to me is not sitting cross legged on "handwoven mats, 
> >  eyes shut tight, sniffing incense and  listening to gongs."
> > 
> > .it's being out there in the real world every minute alert breathing the 
> > breath..."zenning the zen"..so to speak..
> > 
> > . as as for those folk on those forum who are going to clap their hands and 
> > shout "horror horror where the hell is she at"? let me remind them..
> > 
> > .it's not me who's struggling with zen understanding
> > 
> >  it's those hundreds of folk who we see everyday walking and talking as 
> > if in a shadowland( plato's cave)..... 
> > 
> > next time you go to the shopping mall pay close attention and you'll very 
> > soon understand
> > 
> > merle
> > 
> >   
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > It's good to see you back and well. Unfortunately I can't say the same 
> > about your theories. 
> > 
> > 
> > "It's an updated understanding of how mind works that was unknown when the 
> > Zen texts were written."  
> > 
> > 
> > Are you saying that prior to this 'breakthru' in neuroscience the 
> > Patriarchs weren't practicing 'real' Zen, but that you now are? Is this 
> > discovery definitive or could there be further "updates" which would render 
> > the Zen you practice now obsolete? Are you in fact practicing Zen or 
> > something  different entirely?
> > 
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Monday, 29 October 2012, 22:34
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Is buddha nature coninuous?
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > Joe,
> > 
> > I think you have a mistaken interpretation of what 'mind moving' actually 
> > means...
> > 
> > Mind is a computational system that continually computes sensations, 
> > actions etc. Thus mind continually moves. There is no escaping that so long 
> > as you are alive. In fact measurements show that mind is almost as active 
> > during sleep as when awake.
> > 
> > So mind always moves in that sense. Everything you do you do it precisely 
> > because your mind is moving.
> > 
> > What Zen means by mind not moving is different. It means that mind moves in 
> > sync with reality, not in opposition to it. This 'Zen is mind not moving' 
> > platitude was written centuries ago when the computational dynamics of mind 
> > were not understood. It refers to a state when you don't consciously think 
> > you are deciding to take particular actions but actions seem to flow 
> > spontaneously from an unconscious inner source. However it is now known 
> > that is always happening anyway. The conscious mind actually very rarely 
> > makes any decisions at all even though it thinks it does. That's the 
> > illusion. The source of almost all decisions and actions is always the 
> > unconscious inner computational system.
> > 
> > It's an updated understanding of how mind works that was unknown when the 
> > Zen texts were written.
> > 
> > So Zen is 24/7, whether your mind is moving or not. If there is realization 
> > that is. Zen is a matter of realizing what is actually happening, not 
> > getting rid of all thoughts which is of course impossible if you want to 
> > function in reality and survive through the day...
> > 
> > True mindlessness = lobotomy or more accurately being dead!
> > 
> > 
> > If you want a reference even Suzuki Roshi agreed with this when I put it to 
> > him...
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Joe wrote:
> > 
> >   
> > >Edgar,
> > >
> > >Ha, ha.
> > >
> > >Yeah, I don't get what motivates your comment.
> > >
> > >Let's see if, no matter what mind you are in now, you can follow a logical 
> > >exposition:
> > >
> > >The Zen adept Sumie ink artists who paint big black circles on rice paper 
> > >do so with a mind that does not move: I mean, they do it with NO mind (and 
> > >hence, no mind-motion).
> > >
> > >I remember our Shif-fu, on retreats, teaching us how to come OUT of 
> > >meditation.  He'd say, "MOVE YOUR MIND, first, then move your BODY, VERY 
> > >SLOWLY, and sway your body in ever-widening circles from the waist, first 
> > >in direction, then in the other".
> > >
> > >That always seemed like un-necessary advice to me, before certain 
> > >developments on retreat...
> > >
> > >...After which, I found that it was impossible to move the mind, and the 
> > >body could nonetheless move.
> > >
> > >But the months of life afterwards with the mind not moving at all was a 
> > >continuing marvel and surprise.  And yet, life was certainly possible, and 
> > >richer than ever before.  "Decisions" and actions were the best I have 
> > >ever done.
> > >
> > >And, Edgar, I found I could not only write, but I could type.
> > >
> > >I had to type.
> > >
> > >I needed to type because my job was to control an advanced radio-telescope 
> > >from a Tektronix terminal at the top of Pupin Hall, 120th Street and 
> > >Broadway.  I discovered in these months giant filaments of cold molecular 
> > >gas, constrained and confined by magnetic fields, in the Milky Way pouring 
> > >from high above the galactic plane in the Orion-Arm, and down onto the 
> > >galactic disk, where the supersonic impact from the flow stimulated the 
> > >formation of stars in objects like Monoceros R2, and the Rosette Nebula.  
> > >The Great Nebula M42 in Orion is part of this complex.
> > >
> > >Decades more of practice and many more retreats and more awakenings showed 
> > >the same nature and character of our empty, still, awakened state, in the 
> > >midst of no-matter-what activity.  No thoughts: nothing moving.  Life is a 
> > >continuous intuition: the only mind is the mind we all share, which is no 
> > >mind.
> > >
> > >I can say that the currents in the mind, or head, and the feeling or 
> > >sensation that there are thoughts, or ANYTHING moving at all, is an 
> > >illusion that pertains to the un-awakened state, and to that state only.  
> > >These things are illusions and delusions, but the awakened state does not 
> > >deprecate them: they are simply not present in the awakened state, 
> > >however; not present at all.
> > >
> > >Surely, in the un-awakened state, there is the sense of something moving, 
> > >and of something that takes TIME to pass before the awareness.  This 
> > >appears to indicate that free action of the mind is dammed-up, or 
> > >necked-down, in the un-awakened state, into a bottle-neck situation, which 
> > >is just what we might also expect.
> > >
> > >NOT in the awakened state.  Nothing takes time.
> > >
> > >Prajna is likened to LIGHTNING, for this reason, BTW.
> > >
> > >See the Dorje lightning-bolt images at Tibetan places?
> > >
> > >Prajna is entirely spontaneous and can not be mulled-over nor formulated.
> > >
> > >Compassion arises simultaneously with Prajna.  Compassion is not something 
> > >that you FEEL, in the awakened state, you simply respond naturally.
> > >
> > >And so it is.
> > >
> > >--Joe
> > >
> > >> Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Joe,
> > >> 
> > >> Well obviously your mind was moving when you wrote this... The mind has 
> > >> to move to write...
> > >> 
> > >> THAT's the experience...
> > >
> > >
> >
>



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to