Joe, Ouch! I thought we were being nice to each other?
And btw what's this sudden snipping compulsion you have to snip off the bottom of the posts you are responding to? Edgar On Nov 24, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Joe wrote: > Edgar, > > Yeah, yeah, but as you know, it's nothing at all until perceived. > > There is no before and after, to the perceiver. No special status that the > illusion has, while it is not yet perceived as This Mind. Only the perceiver > gets to make the perception. > > You're trying to be on two bases at once. Only the perceiver can judge the > character of things. You may not do so. You are not an Umpire, Edgar! > > In fact, there is no theory. > > --Joe > > > Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote: > > > > Joe, > > > > Well you can say it that way which I have no argument with. I just say that > > the illusions SEEN or REALIZED as illusions are reality. You say they are > > no longer illusions but reality. I have no problem with that but I think it > > runs the risk of misunderstanding the world of forms because what was > > called an illusion before has not somehow mysteriously changed it's > > character, it's character has just been realized. > >
