Mike,

LOL! And then how SWEET the man tasted as the tigers ate HIM!

Edgar



On May 18, 2013, at 12:15 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Merle,
> 
> With pleasure!
> 
> 18. A Parable
> 
> Buddha told a parable in sutra:
> 
> A man traveling across a field encountered a tiger. He fled, the tiger after 
> him. Coming to a precipice, he caught hold of the root of a wild vine and 
> swung himself down over the edge. The tiger sniffed at him from above. 
> Trembling, the man looked down to where, far below, another tiger was waiting 
> to eat him. Only the vine sustained him.
> 
> Two mice, one white and one black, little by little started to gnaw away the 
> vine. The man saw a luscious strawberry near him. Grasping the vine with one 
> hand, he plucked the strawberry with the other. How sweet it tasted!
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> 
> From: Merle Lester <[email protected]>; 
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
> Sent: Sat, May 18, 2013 3:28:23 AM 
> 
> mike..sorry..please repeat the koan..... merle
> 
> Merle,
> 
> Sorry Merle, I'm not sure I'm completely with you here. Do you know the koan 
> I mentioned? It's got nothing to do with myths, but I'd be interested in what 
> you think about it (Note that he didn't say "sour" nor eat the strawberry 
> passively).
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> 
> From: Merle Lester <[email protected]>; 
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
> Sent: Fri, May 17, 2013 12:40:02 PM 
> 
>  
> 
>  there you go i told you so it's a myth...merle
> 
>  
> Mike,
> 
> The strawberry is an illusion in your mind. There are no strawberries here at 
> the moment.
> 
> Neither is there any guy hanging from a cliff.
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On May 17, 2013, at 1:25 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Chris,
>> 
>> Exactly. The man with no Zen would be so enveloped in regret/hope that he 
>> wouldn't be able to experience Suchness in that moment. I fail to see how 
>> this koan could be irrelevant.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>> 
>> From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>; 
>> To: <[email protected]>; 
>> Cc: <[email protected]>; 
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
>> Sent: Fri, May 17, 2013 5:14:39 AM 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The man in the story got sweetness when he was probably expecting fear and 
>> wanting a way out, but he was able to experience the sweetness. May I be so 
>> open to what is. 
>> Thanks,
>> --Chris
>> 301-270-6524
>> On May 16, 2013 10:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Edgar,
>> 
>> Sensation (chewing) comes before perception (sweetness). To attach to the 
>> perception of good/bad leads to suffering. But what of the man on the cliff? 
>> He _exclaimed_ that the strawberry tasted sweet! Not Zen? Irrelevant? I 
>> don't think so. What of the man in the last ox-herding paintings - looks 
>> like a happy chappy to me. I'm surprised (or maybe not) that you're taking 
>> this perspective because you always argue that when illusions are seen as 
>> illusions that is enlightenment. Or do you never enjoy anything?
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>> 
>> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
>> To: <[email protected]>; 
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
>> Sent: Fri, May 17, 2013 1:33:14 AM 
>> 
>>  
>> Mike,
>> 
>> Again you fail to understand the meaning...
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> 
>> On May 16, 2013, at 9:05 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> Merle,
>>> 
>>> Well it seems on this forum that if you've ever tasted sweet strawberries 
>>> you weren't practicing Zen... Talk about blind dogma!
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>>> 
>>> From: Merle Lester <[email protected]>; 
>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
>>> Sent: Thu, May 16, 2013 10:33:24 PM 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> lucky you mike...sweet strawberries... the sweetest i ever tasted was in 
>>> helsinki finland in may 2005.. have yet to find any to compare..merle
>>> 
>>>  
>>> Edgar,
>>> 
>>> Yet it _does_ taste so sweet...
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>>> 
>>> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
>>> Sent: Thu, May 16, 2013 2:11:24 PM 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> Mike,
>>> 
>>> All the forms of the world are Buddha Nature and that includes 
>>> strawberries...
>>> 
>>> However the taste of the strawberry is in your mind, it's a form carrying 
>>> information about how your biological organism relates to the form of the 
>>> strawberry...
>>> 
>>> Edgar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 16, 2013, at 9:27 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Bill!
>>>> 
>>>> Yet the strawberry tastes so sweet! I just feel that your description of 
>>>> Buddha Nature just doesn't seem to engage with life (and yet I know that 
>>>> as 'Bill!' you do!). I think it goes back to the feeling I have that what 
>>>> you say about Buddha Nature, although correct, only focuses on the 
>>>> Absolute. Life is recognising both the relative and absolute as truth. Who 
>>>> wouldn't want to enjoy the taste of a strawberry!
>>>> 
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>>>> 
>>>> From: Bill! <[email protected]>; 
>>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
>>>> Subject: [Zen] Re: Advaita 
>>>> Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 8:18:46 AM 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Mike,
>>>> 
>>>> What you are asking about is the very essence of zen, IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> Non-dualistic (holistic) experience  is the very essence of shikantaza and 
>>>> Buddha Nature as far as I'm concerned.  All zen teaching techniques 
>>>> (counting breaths, koans, chanting, bowing, samu, kinhin, etc...) are 
>>>> employed to do one thing:  stop your intellect from creating the illusion 
>>>> of duality.
>>>> 
>>>> When you are able to do this, to wipe away all illusions, what is left is 
>>>> Buddha Nature or just holistic experience (sensual).  There is no 
>>>> subject/object split.  There is no observer/observed, no 
>>>> experience/experience.  There is Just THIS!
>>>> 
>>>> For example when you bite into a lemon there is no you/lemon split, no 
>>>> taste/smell split, no sour/sweet split, no lemon/other fruit split.  There 
>>>> is Just THIS!  It's later when your intellect kicks in and you start 
>>>> perceiving (rather than just experiencing) that you start assigning 
>>>> categories like lemon, yellow, sour, etc...
>>>> 
>>>> That's what I mean by 'no observer' and that's what 'shikantaza' means by 
>>>> 'just sit', and 'clear mind' or 'no mind'.
>>>> 
>>>> If you'd like to read in more detail what I think about this you can go 
>>>> to:  The Origin of the Illusion of Self which is about the dualistic 
>>>> illusion of self/other.
>>>> 
>>>> ...Bill!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --- In [email protected], uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 
>>>> Bill!,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm interested in your point that there is no observer when sitting 
>>>> shikantaza. If so, are all sensations in the body-mind not experienced? If 
>>>> they are experienced, who or what is experiencing them? 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm also interested in other member's perspectives on this when they get 
>>>> passed the "He said - she said" current thread..
>>>> 
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
>>>> >
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to