Mike,

Did I fail to put in some smile-face emoticons?  ;-)

I must have forgotten.

You missed my irony, or I did not stress it.  Or, I missed yours!

In fact, I was going about making a very serious point, and one that I think 
Edgar would agree with.

If, by (our) effective practice, duality disappears for us in our experience, 
it is far from GONE from the world (of "others", who are yet bewitched with it 
and by it).  As you know, when one continues practicing, after, say awakening, 
one undergoes a polishing, or sand-blasting, process, over years of time (a 
lifetime) and develops skilful means for almost any circumstance, just by 
working-out the proper muscles and keeping the proper ligaments flexible (NOT 
by training for specific, rehearsed cases).

Well... bottom-line...  we slough off the flaked paint chips of duality from 
our own hands and arms, but they are still adhering like unbroken skin to 
others.

It's best not to forget!

--Joe

PS  Unlike what you wrote in your post, I would say something like: Opposites 
are not "transcended" in Buddha Nature.  I do not know what "transcended" would 
mean.  Buddha Nature has nothing going-on, except via specific forms.  Buddha 
Nature takes in all forms.  Some of these look like opposites to one who is not 
awake.  That is all.

> uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>
> Joe,

I dare to in the same way you dare to question my mentioning it! ; )  I'm 
hardly saying anything revolutionary, subversive or heretical. Don't we 
practice koans if not to resolve contradictions and paradoxes in a flash of 
satori? 

> desert_woodworker wrote:

> Mike,

> Now, now. How dare you ask such a deflating question.

> There (!) goes the UNIVERSE! Into a flat pancake. And much flatter > than we 
> can comprehend. Mystery flatness. Gone, gone.

> But not the Parasamgate of the Heart Sutra.

> Seeing that, I feel better. And forgiving. Long life, ;-)

--Joe

> uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>
> Bill!, Sometimes it seems as though you and Edgar are arguing from polar 
> opposites on what emptiness and form are, yet aren't opposites transcended in 
> Buddha Nature, along with all contradictions and paradoxes?



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to