Mike,
Well, I'm just expressing a model or a function or condition of things as
experienced in a state in which duality (and thought) were IMPOSSIBLE (for
about two months, unremittingly, the first time). I don't mean to harangue
with merely personal and idiosyncratic insistence(s). Not me! ;-)
But I like your word "resolved" a lot (even though you put it parenthetically).
I would have to go further, and say that Buddha Nature of course "admits" of
these apparent opposites. They are still there. But they are just not
experienced as opposites by someone who is awake. Their more true
family-relatedness is appreciated ("seen"), as part of one's own nature.
And since they are of your own nature, there is no "contrast" that can assert
itself, and so no way for you to experience them as in any way opposite: they
are only KIN to each other, in Buddha Nature; and, KIN to you (me)!
My word-choice would be "admits"; or, "nonetheless admits".
Or, "welcomes lovingly and seamlessly"; or, "supports as 'actually' non-dual
features, mis-perceived AS dual by beings who are yet dreaming".
--Joe
> uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>
> Joe, How about 'reconciled' (resolved) instead of transcended?
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
