Siska,

See my reply to Bill where I explain..

Edgar


On May 26, 2013, at 6:12 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> > The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
> > are part of reality.
> 
> If I understand correctly, you said, all thoughts are illusory because 
> 'thoughts' to you is how we perceive the reality. And all is illusory because 
> we are still trapped in duality. 
> 
> Also, if I understand correctly, Edgar said, whatever is in our head, that is 
> what it is. Whether or not they are illusory, they are what they are, the 
> reality.
> 
> I think the two of you are not talking about exactly the same thing....
> 
> Siska
> 
> From: "Bill!" <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:28:32 -0000
> To: <[email protected]>
> ReplyTo: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
> 
>  
> Siska,
> 
> No, unfortunately not.
> 
> Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with what 
> I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated. In 
> this case the word is 'forms'.
> 
> Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and 
> we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures and 
> superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
> 
> The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
> are part of reality.
> 
> We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but 
> in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
> 
> Other than that all is well...Bill! 
> 
> --- In [email protected], siska_cen@... wrote:
> >
> > Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
> > 
> > :-)
> > Siska
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...>
> > Sender: [email protected]
> > Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
> > 
> > Bill,
> > 
> > Total agreement as stated.
> > 
> > Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
> > instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Siska,
> > > 
> > > As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
> > > opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
> > > this statement ;>) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
> > > 
> > > Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
> > > 
> > > I looked for my self,
> > > But my self was gone.
> > > The boundaries of my being
> > > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
> > > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > > It always happens like this.
> > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > > Another being takes form.
> > > And when the sea sends word,
> > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > > - Rumi
> > > 
> > > I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
> > > come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
> > > slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
> > > composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
> > > 
> > > I looked for my self,
> > > But my self was gone.
> > > The boundaries of my being
> > > Had disappeared in the sea.
> > > 
> > > Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The illusion 
> > > of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something 
> > > independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has 
> > > vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
> > > 
> > > Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
> > > And a voice returned me to myself.
> > > It always happens like this.
> > > 
> > > Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
> > > interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
> > > between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
> > > much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
> > > 
> > > Sea turns on itself and foams,
> > > And with every foaming bit another body.
> > > Another being takes form.
> > > 
> > > Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
> > > thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
> > > 
> > > And when the sea sends word,
> > > Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
> > > 
> > > But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
> > > into emptiness.
> > > 
> > > That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
> > > Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > 
> > > > I followed until: "Waves broke".
> > > > 
> > > > The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
> > > > 
> > > > Siska
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: "Bill!" BillSmart@
> > > > Sender: [email protected]
> > > > Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Reply-To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ..Bill!
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to