joe..you just are not getting my point!!!!!... i give up..merle Merle,
Once you're dead, it's only the aftermath of the death that could possibly matter. If a Tiger eats you, no one gets to use your organs. Your organs could save and improve the lives of 5 or 6 people. Tiger only gets one meal out of you. Two days later, she'll need another meal. That's not great use of Human tissue. But organ donation has that beat by miles. See you're just now speaking about "the fact", the fact in your present case. But that's too miniscule a conversation, and should not concern us here. Speaking in general, it's better to be shot dead than to be eaten by a Tiger. I know you agree, now that you've refreshed your view of what we're actually talking about. No one wants the cataract-y corneas of most of us "Seniors". Except Tigers. Stay clear of Tigers, and gun-totin' killers, just the same. Long life! --Joe > Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote: > > that's not the point joe... > a tiger is doing what a tiger does..having lunch.. > a murderer is going against the grain of.."thou shalt not kill"...what's > organ donation got to do with this?... > if your over 70 no one wants your worn out organs here in australia.. only > the corneas...
