so what is american...?...merle


  
Chan is Chinese interpretation zen is Japanese. Tibean is Dali Lama? 



On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Merle Lester <[email protected]> wrote:

 
>  
>
>
> 
> Bill...still confused...so zen is  chan...?..if you wish to experience buddha 
>nature directly you do zen?... no buddhism involved...
> so why are you desiring to experience buddha nature and then claim it has 
>nothing to do with buddhism?...  merle
>  
>Merle,
>
>Well, that all depends on what you mean by 'zen'.
>
>I've defined what I mean by zen (lower-case 'z') many, many times on this 
>forum and elsewhere.  A short version of that definition is:  a set of 
>teachings and techniques that first lead you to directly experience reality 
>(a.k.a. Buddha Nature); and then helps you integrate that experience into 
>every facet of your daily life.
>
>These techniques (zazen, chanting, bowing, koans, etc...)do not have to be 
>associated with Buddhism.  If they are then that is Zen Buddhism, and in that 
>case the teachings are encased in the language of Buddhism.  This is fact is 
>how I was introduced to zen, via a Japanese form of Zen Buddhism.
>
>To sum up, I believe zen is not in any way dependent upon Buddhism, Buddhist 
>teachings, dogmas, doctrine or practices.
>
>...Bill!
>
>--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> 
>>  
>>  from what i gather you would not have zen if you did not have 
>> buddhism..correct me if i am incorrect..merle
>>   
>> Merle,
>> 
>> Yes.  IMO zen is not an exclusive subset or sect of Buddhism.
>> 
>> Buddhism is a religion has does have many, many lists of principles, dogma, 
>> doctrines, rituals, precepts, vows, etc...  All these IMO have nothing 
>> directly to do with zen, but in the case of Zen Buddhism are like an add-on 
>> covering and adornments that are wrapped around zen.  In the case of most 
>> other Buddhist sects zen does not play any part, and is in fact seen as a 
>> cult.
>> 
>> This is why I draw a distinction between zen with a lower-case 'z' which is 
>> a common noun and refers only the zen in general, and Zen with an upper-case 
>> 'Z' which is a proper noun referring to Zen Buddhism.
>> 
>> This again is IMO and is not the traditional view of Zen Buddhism...by those 
>> that identify themselves as Zen Buddhists.
>> 
>> ...Bill!
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  hallo bill...so tell me why oh why is the classification referred to 
>> > as zen buddhism?... can you have zen without buddhist principles?... merle
>> >   
>> > Merle,
>> > 
>> > As you should very well know by now I don't identify with being a Buddhist.
>> > 
>> > I do however practice zen and have for over 45 years; but just because I 
>> > practice zen doesn't mean I don't feel pain, or have other delusions.  
>> > What it means is that (most of the time) I am not attached to those 
>> > delusions.
>> > 
>> > ...Bill!
>> > 
>> > ...Bill!
>> > 
>> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >  bill...acceptance is the key...what sort odf a zen buddhist are 
>> > > you?..merle
>> > >   
>> > > Merle,
>> > > 
>> > > Yes!  Why me?  Why not someone else?  Someone I don't like?  Someone who 
>> > > doesn't look like me or is the same color as me or speaks the same 
>> > > language as I do.  Someone ELSE!
>> > > 
>> > > ...Bill!
>> > > 
>> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > ÃÆ'‚ bill...not why me...that's plain silly..why not 
>> > > > you?...merle
>> > > > ÃÆ'‚  
>> > > > Merle,
>> > > > 
>> > > > I have been in pain before.  When I am in pain I don't think of pain 
>> > > > as a judgmental delusion, I think of it as pain and judge it to be 
>> > > > bad; and maybe even think "Poor, poor me!  Why do I have to suffer all 
>> > > > this pain?  What did I do to deserve this?  I just want it to go 
>> > > > away!".
>> > > > 
>> > > > ...Bill! 
>> > > > 
>> > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ have you been in pain 
>> > > > > bill..and thought it was judgemental delusion?...merle
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  
>> > > > > Merle,
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > I don't know how you got from what I said earlier to your post below.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > The experience of feeling/touch is real.  That experience is Buddha 
>> > > > > Nature.  The classification of it as 'pain' is the judgmental 
>> > > > > delusion.  Just as the experience of sight is real.  The 
>> > > > > classification of it as 'a red bird' is the delusion.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > ...Bill! 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > >  bill...i see...so if one is in pain..this is an illusion..try 
>> > > > > > telling that to someone bowled over and in agony...merle
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > >   
>> > > > > > Merle,
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > I also want to add that experiencing Buddha Nature, such as 
>> > > > > > through zazen, does not involve a disconnection with the body.  It 
>> > > > > > involves a disconnection with the illusion of self and all dualism.
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > ...Bill!
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Merle,
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > No, the body is not a restraint.  It is a gateway - at least as 
>> > > > > > > far as zen is concerned.  The body, or at least its ability to 
>> > > > > > > afford awareness of reality, is the necessary component of 
>> > > > > > > Buddha Nature for not only humans but all beings as we know them.
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > ...Bill!
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > i know this is a little crazy..however here i go..ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > the human body..can we exist without it?...we do when we are 
>> > > > > > > > in cyber space.... although we need the body to get the 
>> > > > > > > > messages out there...mm that has me stumped!
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > would this body less be liken to the meditation ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  state that can be achieved once one has surpassed the breath 
>> > > > > > > > counting saga?
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  i have belief that monks can practise a form of meditation 
>> > > > > > > > whereby the can slow the whole body/ mind totally down to an 
>> > > > > > > > almost non existent state
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > in all the many previous post there has been much focus on 
>> > > > > > > > slowing the mind down..however the body..does it have a mind 
>> > > > > > > > of it's own so to speak?
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > after all there are millions of tiny organisms..rummaging in 
>> > > > > > > > the body that we do not have any control over what so ever...
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > (meditate as long and hard as you want, they do their own 
>> > > > > > > > thing regardless)...
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > a whole eco system...one could say a universe lies in the gut
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  my zen question is thus: ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  to be totally free ..the human body is it a restraint?
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  merle
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
>> > > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
>> > > > > > > >  
>> > > > > > > > Merle
>> > > > > > > > www.wix.com/merlewiitpom/1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Larry Maher 
 

Reply via email to