Hi Alex

> I have no interest in teaching zen. Zen to me is a
> dead horse. Only pathetic academics teach zen.
> The only thing I'm interested in is teaching the
> central philosophy of Buddhism, which is Madhyamika.
> That's all. And that's only because I've noticed that
> this central, essential teaching is criminally
> underrepresented among all walks of the Buddhist
> practitioners today. I bet you that on this list there
> are very few people who are really experts on this,
> the most important of all Buddhist teachings.

The are many roads that lead to truth. It is said that the Buddha 
taught 84,000 Dharmas, meaning that He has taught many, many, many 
methods of liberation. And depending on each individual's 
inclination, every method is a good method as long as it works. Just 
because you like Madhyamika teachings does not mean you have to 
oppose Zen. To insist that Madhyamika is the one and only way is 
definitely not a very Middle Way approach.
I do feel that Madhyamika teachings are more suitable for people who 
are more intellectually inclined, and you appear to be so. And good 
for you that you are able to encounter such a wonderful and suitable 
teaching.

> Nice stock answer. But you failed to notice that I
> explicitly wanted to *talk* about the Middle Way.
> I'm not asking how to live it, just how would you
> explain it (intellectually).

For Zen people to go into intellectual discussion of Madhyamika is 
actually a step *backwards*. Not that there is anything wrong with 
Madhyamika (it is a wonderful teaching), but because intellectual 
discussion is unable to access truths, since truths are beyond 
conceptualization and hence inexpressible through speech, except 
with 'live' words.
I'm sure intellectual discussion has some merits of its own. But 
after you have crossed the river, would you still want to be carrying 
the raft?
When Nagarjuna taught Madhyamika, I doubt very much that He wants you 
to only indulge yourself in intellectual discussion, for that would 
be mistaking the finger for the moon. He would want you to digest the 
teachings and EXPERIENCE truths DIRECTLY instead of through your 
INTELLECT.

If you find *talking* about the Middle Way so fulfilling , don't you 
feel that *living* the Middle Way will be even more fulfilling? And 
it is only through *living* the teachings that they truly come 
*alive*.

> To me, this is a cause for alarm. That's why I'm
> seizing every opportunity to promote Nagarjuna's
> teaching. People are blissfully unaware of it, even
> some of my hard core Buddhist friends who have been
> practising full tilt for almost 40 years. And not
> being aware of the full blown teaching of Nagarjuna is
> truly sad, in my eyes.

To me, this too is a cause for alarm. That's why I'm
seizing every opportunity to promote Zen
teaching. People are blissfully unaware of it, even
some of my hard core Buddhist friends who have been
practising full tilt for almost 20 years. And not
being aware of the full blown teaching of Zen is
truly sad, in my eyes. :->>

> Again, let me assure you that zen is not something I'm
> interested in.
> No one did zen in the Buddha's and Nagarjuna's time,
> yet these people are not less brilliant for not doing
> zen and attending the sesshin and what not.

What makes you so sure that no one did Zen during Buddha's or 
Nagarjuna's time?

Best wishes
wai

ps. Will be away over the weekend. Hope to chat again next week. Have 
a nice weekend.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/S27xlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Noble Eightfold Path: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right  Action, Right 
Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration, Right Livelihood 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZenForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to