On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting discussion in this thread. I'd like to put up my hand for not > throwing out work that has been done, but instead improving communication > with our users so that what we arrive at with OMQ/3.0 can really be a > stable API that will last for many years. +1 > After all, 3.0 *is* a major version change. We can explicitly break things, > as long as we don't remove functionality people are using without providing > alternatives, and as long as the breakage has been clearly justified. Including things like a new wire level protocol that can be done properly, make 0MQ robust enough to be used in the wild, and allow competitive stacks. > Brian, I especially like your analogy with LEGO bricks. This is really what > I think ZeroMQ is about -- being the LEGO with which people can build all > kinds of weird and wonderful distributed applications that those of us who > built the tool didn't even think of. +1. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
