IMHO, if the changes are previously documented and discussed this should be okay with everybody. I really don't like to be surprised with API change or tool/function removal (zmq_device in my case) when there is no clear answer to "what can I use instead and how?"
2011/4/10 Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > In the recent month, the discussion about 0MQ/3.0 have shown that the > radical "parting with the past design flaws" goal of the endeavour > cannot be achieved. Every tweak has its user that will be hurt if its > removed. That makes the 3.0 version more or less useless: The flaws > won't be fixed while at the same time the backward incompatible changes > will hurt everybody. > > Thus, we should revert the 3.0-related changes on master and go further > with 2.x version, in a fully backward compatible way. > > Thoughts anyone? > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Antoine Boegli software engineer & linux expert _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
