Hi Martin,

10.04.2011, 20:22, "Martin Sustrik" <[email protected]>:
>
> My point now is that the discussion around 3.0 proved that no
> substantial fixes to 0MQ design (say removing identities) can be done
> even if major version is bumped.
>
> Thus, the whole move to 3.0 would introduce only cosmetic changes to the
> API.
>
> Which is really not worth all the upgrade trouble.
>

I'm more or less agree with your opinion. The new ideas which are floating 
around should be more formalized before being implemented. And even more 
justification needed for introducing backward incompatible changes.

As for ZMQ_SWAP and zmq_device they probably should be deprecated in 2.3, and 
probably should have only critical bugs fixed in the future to decrease 
maintainance pain. Other changes are really just cosmetic, and all this don't 
have to introduce backwards incompatible changes by themselves, just to be 
cleaned up when time for major version comes.

--
Paul
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to