On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Steffen Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Frankly, I fail to see what's so funky about not wanting to block the sender > if the receiver is restarted, using the queuing of the library[1]. > > Either way, I understand the message (and Chuck's, too). I'll roll my own > solution. You seem annoyed that ZeroMQ somehow does not live up to your expectations. Yet the patterns which ZeroMQ enables are well documented, and the material that explains how to build on top is vast, and translated into dozens of programming languages. I've no strong opinion on this, but you might reflect on what it looks like to others. You find a free library, made by others over years at their expense. You do not read the available material (or you skim it). You ask for, and get expert advice, for free. Then you complain that the tool doesn't fit your personal use case as though the universe was designed for you? Steffen, seriously? Learn it, use it, and if you can improve it, send us a patch. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
