Hi Michel, On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Michel Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote: > These are the types that tend to set HWM to 1. It's hard > to convince them that this is the wrong approach and that the right > approach is to have peers communicate their states and message acks to > each other and that you have to deal with the cases where things fall > down. >
Can you be more specific, why setting HWM to 1 is a bad thing? Do you mean, that it smells bad to set HWM to 1 for reliability? Or do you think that setting it will have other consequences? (low performance?) (I'm asking that because we are discussing an issue of setting HWM to 1 always in crossroads-io, which is zeromq fork) -- Paul _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
