0mq will live or die on it's merits. I think the best response to such discussions is to produce great things built with 0mq.
Github commits are, in my opinion, better arguments than blog comments. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, jeff murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://linuxfr.org/nodes/96358/comments/1407288 > > On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 AM, LECLERCQ Nicolas > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Could someone react to the following (french) post please? >> http://linuxfr.org/users/krunch/journaux/zeromq-et-les-mangoustes >> The idea is clearly not to involve you in controversy. The aim is just to >> have the zmq community's point of view on an article which content >> conflicts with what is explained in: >> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning. Your contribution would help guys >> trying to make a choice for their future projects. >> Thanks for your help. >> N. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
