Hello Lourens!

I fail to see the "failure" here.  A new feature that people wanted
was added to a release candidate.  Problems were found, in the release
candidate.  The feature, based on community feedback, was reworked and
fixed.

To me, this looks like a success!

Brian

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Lourens Naudé
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> It references a feature I contributed that yes, admittedly, should have been
> discussed better. This particular feature suffered from some stability
> issues for a while, mostly as a result of a bad variable args API decision
> and touching code paths that's not easy to cover in tests ( runs within the
> context of an I/O thread and deals with the network ). It's been reworked
> after RC1 from community feedback.
>
> Apologies for shipping something implicated in this bad publicity, however,
> it's still a pretty narrow rant.
>
> - Lourens
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Brian Knox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 0mq will live or die on it's merits.
>>
>> I think the best response to such discussions is to produce great
>> things built with 0mq.
>>
>> Github commits are, in my opinion,  better arguments than blog comments.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, jeff murphy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > http://linuxfr.org/nodes/96358/comments/1407288
>> >
>> > On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 AM, LECLERCQ Nicolas
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> Could someone react to the following (french) post please?
>> >> http://linuxfr.org/users/krunch/journaux/zeromq-et-les-mangoustes
>> >> The idea is clearly not to involve you in controversy. The aim is just
>> >> to
>> >> have the zmq community's point of view on an article which content
>> >> conflicts with what is explained in:
>> >> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning. Your contribution would help
>> >> guys
>> >> trying to make a choice for their future projects.
>> >> Thanks for your help.
>> >> N.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to