I agree with Brian on both his points. This a lot of raffut about nothing. If these people don't want to use 0mq, we'll be happy to eat their lunch.
-Michel On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Brian Knox <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Lourens! > > I fail to see the "failure" here. A new feature that people wanted > was added to a release candidate. Problems were found, in the release > candidate. The feature, based on community feedback, was reworked and > fixed. > > To me, this looks like a success! > > Brian > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Lourens Naudé > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > It references a feature I contributed that yes, admittedly, should have > been > > discussed better. This particular feature suffered from some stability > > issues for a while, mostly as a result of a bad variable args API > decision > > and touching code paths that's not easy to cover in tests ( runs within > the > > context of an I/O thread and deals with the network ). It's been reworked > > after RC1 from community feedback. > > > > Apologies for shipping something implicated in this bad publicity, > however, > > it's still a pretty narrow rant. > > > > - Lourens > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Brian Knox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> 0mq will live or die on it's merits. > >> > >> I think the best response to such discussions is to produce great > >> things built with 0mq. > >> > >> Github commits are, in my opinion, better arguments than blog comments. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, jeff murphy <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > http://linuxfr.org/nodes/96358/comments/1407288 > >> > > >> > On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 AM, LECLERCQ Nicolas > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> Could someone react to the following (french) post please? > >> >> http://linuxfr.org/users/krunch/journaux/zeromq-et-les-mangoustes > >> >> The idea is clearly not to involve you in controversy. The aim is > just > >> >> to > >> >> have the zmq community's point of view on an article which content > >> >> conflicts with what is explained in: > >> >> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning. Your contribution would help > >> >> guys > >> >> trying to make a choice for their future projects. > >> >> Thanks for your help. > >> >> N. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > zeromq-dev mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
