Yes, this is expected behavior. Each connect is independent. In
pub-sub this produces nonsense results but in other patterns it can be
used to do things like prioritize one node over others (e.g. a PULL
that connects twice to a PUSH).

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Trevor Bernard
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a PUB/SUB topology and I accidently called connect twice to the
> same PUB endpoint and received duplicate messages. This holds true for
> N connects as well. Is this the correct behaviour?
>
> Simple test that recreates it:
>
>     
> https://github.com/trevorbernard/double-trouble/blob/master/src/double_trouble/core.clj
>
> -Trev
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



-- 
-
Pieter Hintjens
CEO of iMatix.com
Founder of ZeroMQ community
blog: http://hintjens.com
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to