Should I submit an issue for this feature? I would find it extremely useful.
-Trev On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > Having said that, it is undocumented behavior, and there is no valid > use for this in pub-sub (nor in dealer-router, nor in req-rep) and we > might want to change the behavior. We do know what endpoints are > already used, and could reject duplicate connects to the same > endpoint. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: >> Yes, this is expected behavior. Each connect is independent. In >> pub-sub this produces nonsense results but in other patterns it can be >> used to do things like prioritize one node over others (e.g. a PULL >> that connects twice to a PUSH). >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Trevor Bernard >> <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I have a PUB/SUB topology and I accidently called connect twice to the >>> same PUB endpoint and received duplicate messages. This holds true for >>> N connects as well. Is this the correct behaviour? >>> >>> Simple test that recreates it: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/trevorbernard/double-trouble/blob/master/src/double_trouble/core.clj >>> >>> -Trev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> - >> Pieter Hintjens >> CEO of iMatix.com >> Founder of ZeroMQ community >> blog: http://hintjens.com > > > > -- > - > Pieter Hintjens > CEO of iMatix.com > Founder of ZeroMQ community > blog: http://hintjens.com > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
