Thanks for the quick reply
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, this is expected behavior. Each connect is independent. In > pub-sub this produces nonsense results but in other patterns it can be > used to do things like prioritize one node over others (e.g. a PULL > that connects twice to a PUSH). > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Trevor Bernard > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a PUB/SUB topology and I accidently called connect twice to the >> same PUB endpoint and received duplicate messages. This holds true for >> N connects as well. Is this the correct behaviour? >> >> Simple test that recreates it: >> >> >> https://github.com/trevorbernard/double-trouble/blob/master/src/double_trouble/core.clj >> >> -Trev >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > -- > - > Pieter Hintjens > CEO of iMatix.com > Founder of ZeroMQ community > blog: http://hintjens.com > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
